Literature DB >> 16537505

Highly designable phenotypes and mutational buffers emerge from a systematic mapping between network topology and dynamic output.

Yigal D Nochomovitz1, Hao Li.   

Abstract

Deciphering the design principles for regulatory networks is fundamental to an understanding of biological systems. We have explored the mapping from the space of network topologies to the space of dynamical phenotypes for small networks. Using exhaustive enumeration of a simple model of three- and four-node networks, we demonstrate that certain dynamical phenotypes can be generated by an atypically broad spectrum of network topologies. Such dynamical outputs are highly designable, much like certain protein structures can be designed by an unusually broad spectrum of sequences. The network topologies that encode a highly designable dynamical phenotype possess two classes of connections: a fully conserved core of dedicated connections that encodes the stable dynamical phenotype and a partially conserved set of variable connections that controls the transient dynamical flow. By comparing the topologies and dynamics of the three- and four-node network ensembles, we observe a large number of instances of the phenomenon of "mutational buffering," whereby addition of a fourth node suppresses phenotypic variation amongst a set of three-node networks.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16537505      PMCID: PMC1449667          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507032103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

Review 1.  Principles for the buffering of genetic variation.

Authors:  J L Hartman; B Garvik; L Hartwell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Closing the loop: the PmrA/PmrB two-component system negatively controls expression of its posttranscriptional activator PmrD.

Authors:  Akinori Kato; Tammy Latifi; Eduardo A Groisman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Directed evolution of a genetic circuit.

Authors:  Yohei Yokobayashi; Ron Weiss; Frances H Arnold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks.

Authors:  R Milo; S Shen-Orr; S Itzkovitz; N Kashtan; D Chklovskii; U Alon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Quantitative kinetic analysis of the bacteriophage lambda genetic network.

Authors:  Oren Kobiler; Assaf Rokney; Nir Friedman; Donald L Court; Joel Stavans; Amos B Oppenheim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Stable and unstable attractors in Boolean networks.

Authors:  Konstantin Klemm; Stefan Bornholdt
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2005-11-16

Review 7.  Cyclin-dependent kinases: engines, clocks, and microprocessors.

Authors:  D O Morgan
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 13.827

8.  Are protein folds atypical?

Authors:  H Li; C Tang; N S Wingreen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The logical analysis of continuous, non-linear biochemical control networks.

Authors:  L Glass; S A Kauffman
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Circuit simulation of genetic networks.

Authors:  H H McAdams; L Shapiro
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  17 in total

1.  Process-based network decomposition reveals backbone motif structure.

Authors:  Guanyu Wang; Chenghang Du; Hao Chen; Rahul Simha; Yongwu Rong; Yi Xiao; Chen Zeng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The structure of the genotype-phenotype map strongly constrains the evolution of non-coding RNA.

Authors:  Kamaludin Dingle; Steffen Schaper; Ard A Louis
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networks.

Authors:  S Ciliberti; O C Martin; A Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Inference of Boolean networks using sensitivity regularization.

Authors:  Wenbin Liu; Harri Lähdesmäki; Edward R Dougherty; Ilya Shmulevich
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2008

Review 5.  Evolution of transcription networks--lessons from yeasts.

Authors:  Hao Li; Alexander D Johnson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Cancer as robust intrinsic state of endogenous molecular-cellular network shaped by evolution.

Authors:  Ping Ao; David Galas; Leroy Hood; Xiaomei Zhu
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 1.538

7.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Ryoji Yanashima; Noriyuki Kitagawa; Yoshiya Matsubara; Robert Weatheritt; Kotaro Oka; Shinichi Kikuchi; Masaru Tomita; Shun Ishizaki
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.081

8.  Process-driven inference of biological network structure: feasibility, minimality, and multiplicity.

Authors:  Guanyu Wang; Yongwu Rong; Hao Chen; Carl Pearson; Chenghang Du; Rahul Simha; Chen Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Borges dilemma, fundamental laws, and systems biology.

Authors:  Ping Ao
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2008-04-10

10.  Constraint and contingency in multifunctional gene regulatory circuits.

Authors:  Joshua L Payne; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.