Literature DB >> 1653594

Lisinopril versus atenolol: decrease in systolic versus diastolic blood pressure with converting enzyme inhibition.

B E Pannier1, V G Garabedian, O Madonna, M Fouchard, B Darne, M E Safar.   

Abstract

In a multicenter, parallel, double-blind study, lisinopril, a new converting enzyme inhibitor, was compared with atenolol in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. Four hundred ninety patients were randomized to once-a-day treatment with lisinopril 20 mg or atenolol 50 mg for 4 weeks, and the doses of lisinopril or atenolol were increased at 4-week intervals up to 80 mg or 200 mg, respectively, if sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) was not well controlled. Lisinopril and atenolol reduced SDBP to a similar extent. All reductions from baseline in sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure were significant (p less than 0.01). Lisinopril produced a significantly greater reduction (p less than 0.01) in sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP) than atenolol. The predominant reduction in SSBP could not be explained on the basis of age, race, or severity of hypertension. It is suggested that the increase in arterial compliance reported for converting enzyme inhibitors could explain the predominant decrease in systolic blood pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1653594     DOI: 10.1007/bf03029754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther        ISSN: 0920-3206            Impact factor:   3.727


  9 in total

1.  The antihypertensive effect of lisinopril compared to atenolol in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  K Bolzano; J Arriaga; R Bernal; H Bernardes; J L Calderon; J Debruyn; F Dienstl; J Drayer; T L Goodfriend; W Gross
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Antihypertensive efficacy of once daily MK-521, a new nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.

Authors:  H H Rotmensch; P H Vlasses; B N Swanson; J D Irvin; K E Harris; D G Merrill; R K Ferguson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  Effect of converting enzyme inhibitors on hypertensive large arteries in humans.

Authors:  M E Safar; S L Laurent; J D Bouthier; G M London; A R Mimran
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1986-12

4.  Enalapril in moderate to severe hypertension: a comparison with atenolol.

Authors:  J Webster; J C Petrie; O J Robb; J Trafford; J Burgess; P J Richardson; C Davidson; G Fairhurst; M J Vandenburg; W D Cooper
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Does a renal vasodilator system mediate racial differences in essential hypertension?

Authors:  S E Warren; D T O'Connor
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Effects of chronic administration of enalapril and propranolol on the large arteries in essential hypertension.

Authors:  A C Simon; J Levenson; J D Bouthier; M E Safar
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.105

7.  Pharmacodynamics of converting enzyme inhibition: the cardiovascular, endocrine and autonomic effects of MK421 (enalapril) and MK521.

Authors:  J A Millar; F H Derkx; K McLean; J L Reid
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Enalapril in essential hypertension: a comparative study with propranolol. Enalapril in Hypertension Study Group (UK).

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Enalapril, atenolol, and hydrochlorothiazide in mild to moderate hypertension. A comparative multicentre study in general practice in Norway.

Authors:  A Helgeland; R Strømmen; C H Hagelund; S Tretli
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-04-19       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of hypertension in the elderly--the end of the story?

Authors:  L H Opie
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 2.  The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET). Rationale, methodology and comparison with previous trials.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt; A E Fletcher; A Amery; J Coope; J G Evans; S Lightowlers; K O'Malley; A Palmer; J Potter; P Sever
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  ACE inhibition versus calcium antagonism in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: a multicentre study. Ireland-Netherlands Lisinopril-Nifedipine Study Group.

Authors:  W Hart; R J Clarke
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.401

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.