Literature DB >> 16535081

Methylmercury oxidative degradation potentials in contaminated and pristine sediments of the carson river, nevada.

R S Oremland, L G Miller, P Dowdle, T Connell, T Barkay.   

Abstract

Sediments from mercury-contaminated and uncontaminated reaches of the Carson River, Nevada, were assayed for sulfate reduction, methanogenesis, denitrification, and monomethylmercury (MeHg) degradation. Demethylation of [(sup14)C]MeHg was detected at all sites as indicated by the formation of (sup14)CO(inf2) and (sup14)CH(inf4). Oxidative demethylation was indicated by the formation of (sup14)CO(inf2) and was present at significant levels in all samples. Oxidized/reduced demethylation product ratios (i.e., (sup14)CO(inf2)/(sup14)CH(inf4) ratios) generally ranged from 4.0 in surface layers to as low as 0.5 at depth. Production of (sup14)CO(inf2) was most pronounced at sediment surfaces which were zones of active denitrification and sulfate reduction but was also significant within zones of methanogenesis. In a core taken from an uncontaminated site having a high proportion of oxidized, coarse-grain sediments, sulfate reduction and methanogenic activity levels were very low and (sup14)CO(inf2) accounted for 98% of the product formed from [(sup14)C]MeHg. There was no apparent relationship between the degree of mercury contamination of the sediments and the occurrence of oxidative demethylation. However, sediments from Fort Churchill, the most contaminated site, were most active in terms of demethylation potentials. Inhibition of sulfate reduction with molybdate resulted in significantly depressed oxidized/reduced demethylation product ratios, but overall demethylation rates of inhibited and uninhibited samples were comparable. Addition of sulfate to sediment slurries stimulated production of (sup14)CO(inf2) from [(sup14)C]MeHg, while 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid blocked production of (sup14)CH(inf4). These results reveal the importance of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria in oxidative demethylation of MeHg in anoxic environments.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 16535081      PMCID: PMC1388499          DOI: 10.1128/aem.61.7.2745-2753.1995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  28 in total

1.  Seasonal and spatial variations in mercury methylation and demethylation in an oligotrophic lake.

Authors:  E T Korthals; M R Winfrey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Metabolism of acetate, methanol, and methylated amines in intertidal sediments of lowes cove, maine.

Authors:  G M King; M J Klug; D R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Selenate reduction to elemental selenium by anaerobic bacteria in sediments and culture: biogeochemical significance of a novel, sulfate-independent respiration.

Authors:  R S Oremland; J T Hollibaugh; A S Maest; T S Presser; L G Miller; C W Culbertson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Selective inhibition of ammonium oxidation and nitrification-linked n(2)o formation by methyl fluoride and dimethyl ether.

Authors:  L G Miller; M D Coutlakis; R S Oremland; B B Ward
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Sulfate-reducing bacteria: principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment.

Authors:  G C Compeau; R Bartha
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Methylmercury decomposition in sediments and bacterial cultures: involvement of methanogens and sulfate reducers in oxidative demethylation.

Authors:  R S Oremland; C W Culbertson; M R Winfrey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Improved Method for Recovery of mRNA from Aquatic Samples and Its Application to Detection of mer Expression.

Authors:  W H Jeffrey; S Nazaret; R Von Haven
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Denitrification in san francisco bay intertidal sediments.

Authors:  R S Oremland; C Umberger; C W Culbertson; R L Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Methylmercury Resistance in Desulfovibrio desulfuricans Strains in Relation to Methylmercury Degradation.

Authors:  F Baldi; M Pepi; M Filippelli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Effect of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in freshwater sediments.

Authors:  M R Winfrey; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  9 in total

1.  Investigations into the differential reactivity of endogenous and exogenous mercury species in coastal sediments.

Authors:  S Bouchet; P Rodriguez-Gonzalez; R Bridou; M Monperrus; E Tessier; P Anschutz; R Guyoneaud; D Amouroux
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Periphyton and Flocculent Materials Are Important Ecological Compartments Supporting Abundant and Diverse Mercury Methylator Assemblages in the Florida Everglades.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Bae; Forrest E Dierberg; Andrew Ogram
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Distribution patterns of mercury in lakes and rivers of northeastern North America.

Authors:  Ian F Dennis; Thomas A Clair; Charles T Driscoll; Neil Kamman; Ann Chalmers; Jamie Shanley; Stephen A Norton; Steve Kahl
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Bacterial Dissimilatory Reduction of Arsenic(V) to Arsenic(III) in Anoxic Sediments.

Authors:  P R Dowdle; A M Laverman; R S Oremland
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Sediment microbial community composition and methylmercury pollution at four mercury mine-impacted sites.

Authors:  K M Batten; K M Scow
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Genome-Resolved Metagenomics and Detailed Geochemical Speciation Analyses Yield New Insights into Microbial Mercury Cycling in Geothermal Springs.

Authors:  Caitlin M Gionfriddo; Matthew B Stott; Jean F Power; Jacob M Ogorek; David P Krabbenhoft; Ryan Wick; Kathryn Holt; Lin-Xing Chen; Brian C Thomas; Jillian F Banfield; John W Moreau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Methylmercury uptake and degradation by methanotrophs.

Authors:  Xia Lu; Wenyu Gu; Linduo Zhao; Muhammad Farhan Ul Haque; Alan A DiSpirito; Jeremy D Semrau; Baohua Gu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Prevalence of Heterotrophic Methylmercury Detoxifying Bacteria across Oceanic Regions.

Authors:  Isabel Sanz-Sáez; Carla Pereira-García; Andrea G Bravo; Laura Trujillo; Martí Pla I Ferriol; Miguel Capilla; Pablo Sánchez; Rosa Carmen Rodríguez Martín-Doimeadios; Silvia G Acinas; Olga Sánchez
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Methane Oxidation and Molecular Characterization of Methanotrophs from a Former Mercury Mine Impoundment.

Authors:  Shaun M Baesman; Laurence G Miller; Jeremy H Wei; Yirang Cho; Emily D Matys; Roger E Summons; Paula V Welander; Ronald S Oremland
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2015-06-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.