Literature DB >> 16349013

Methylmercury Resistance in Desulfovibrio desulfuricans Strains in Relation to Methylmercury Degradation.

F Baldi1, M Pepi, M Filippelli.   

Abstract

Two strains of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans, one known to synthesize monomethylmercury from ionic mercury, were grown to determine methylmercury toxicity and for comparison with an anaerobic strain of Clostridium pasteurianum, a H(2) producer, and with the broad-spectrum mercury-resistant Pseudomonas putida strain FB-1, capable of degrading 1 mug of methylmercury to methane and elemental mercury in 2 h. The CH(3)HgCl resistance of D. desulfuricans strains was 10 times that of P. putida FB-1 and 100 times that of C. pasteurianum. The methylmercury resistance of D. desulfuricans was related to the disappearance of methylmercury from cultures by transformation to dimethylmercury, metacinnabar, methane, and traces of ionic mercury. During a 15-day experiment the kinetics of the two volatile compounds dimethylmercury [(CH(3))(2)Hg] and methane were monitored in the liquid by a specific new technique with purge-and-trap gas chromatography in line with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and in the headspace by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. Insoluble metacinnabar (cubic HgS) of biological origin was detected by X-ray diffractometry in the gray precipitate from the insoluble residue of the pellet of a 1-liter culture spiked with 100 mg of CH(3)HgCl. This was compared with a 1-liter culture of D. desulfuricans LS spiked with 100 mg of HgCl(2). In a further experiment, it was demonstrated that insoluble, decomposable, white dimethylmercury sulfide [(CH(3)Hg)(2)S] formed instantly in the reaction of methylmercury with hydrogen sulfide. This organomercurial was extracted with chloroform and identified by gas chromatography in line with mass spectrometry. The D. desulfuricans strains were resistant to high concentrations of methylmercury because they produced insoluble dimethylmercury sulfide, which slowly decomposed under anaerobic conditions to metacinnabar and volatilized to dimethylmercury and methane between pHs 6.2 and 6.5 for high (4.5-g . liter) or low (0.09-g . liter) sulfate contents. Methane was produced from CH(3)HgCl at a lower rate than by the broad-spectrum Hg-resistant P. putida strain FB-1.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 16349013      PMCID: PMC182309          DOI: 10.1128/aem.59.8.2479-2485.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  18 in total

1.  Kinetics of mercury methylation in aerobic and anaerobic aquatic environments.

Authors:  J J Bisogni; A W Lawrence
Journal:  J Water Pollut Control Fed       Date:  1975-01

2.  Carbon Flow in Mercury Biomethylation by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans.

Authors:  M Berman; T Chase; R Bartha
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Methylmercury decomposition in sediments and bacterial cultures: involvement of methanogens and sulfate reducers in oxidative demethylation.

Authors:  R S Oremland; C W Culbertson; M R Winfrey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Methylation of mercury compounds by methylcobalamin.

Authors:  L Bertilsson; H Y Neujahr
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1971-07-06       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Biological methylation of mercury in aquatic organisms.

Authors:  S Jensen; A Jernelöv
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Determination of trace amounts of organic and inorganic mercury in biological materials by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry and organic mercury speciation by gas chromatography.

Authors:  M Filippelli
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1987-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Effects of sea salt anions on the formation and stability of methylmercury.

Authors:  G Compeau; R Bartha
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Plasmid-controlled mercury biotransformation by Clostridium cochlearium T-2.

Authors:  H S Pan-Hou; M Hosono; N Imura
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Biodegradation of phenylmercuric acetate by mercury-resistant bacteria.

Authors:  J D Nelson; W Blair; F E Brinckman; R R Colwell; W P Iverson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-09

10.  Cobalamin-mediated mercury methylation by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans LS.

Authors:  S C Choi; R Bartha
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  10 in total

1.  Phytoremediation of methylmercury pollution: merB expression in Arabidopsis thaliana confers resistance to organomercurials.

Authors:  S P Bizily; C L Rugh; A O Summers; R B Meagher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mercury analysis of acid- and alkaline-reduced biological samples: identification of meta-cinnabar as the major biotransformed compound in algae.

Authors:  David Kelly; Kenneth Budd; Daniel D Lefebvre
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Methylmercury oxidative degradation potentials in contaminated and pristine sediments of the carson river, nevada.

Authors:  R S Oremland; L G Miller; P Dowdle; T Connell; T Barkay
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Active transport, substrate specificity, and methylation of Hg(II) in anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  Jeffra K Schaefer; Sara S Rocks; Wang Zheng; Liyuan Liang; Baohua Gu; François M M Morel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Biotransformation of Hg(II) by cyanobacteria.

Authors:  Daniel D Lefebvre; David Kelly; Kenneth Budd
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Enzymatic catalysis of mercury methylation by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans LS.

Authors:  S C Choi; T Chase; R Bartha
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Expanded Diversity and Phylogeny of mer Genes Broadens Mercury Resistance Paradigms and Reveals an Origin for MerA Among Thermophilic Archaea.

Authors:  Christos A Christakis; Tamar Barkay; Eric S Boyd
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Dimethylmercury Formation Mediated by Inorganic and Organic Reduced Sulfur Surfaces.

Authors:  Sofi Jonsson; Nashaat M Mazrui; Robert P Mason
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  New Insights into Alterations in PL Proteins Affecting Their Binding to DNA after Exposure of Mytilus galloprovincialis to Mercury-A Possible Risk to Sperm Chromatin Structure?

Authors:  Gennaro Lettieri; Rosaria Notariale; Nadia Carusone; Antonella Giarra; Marco Trifuoggi; Caterina Manna; Marina Piscopo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Evidence of Mercury Methylation and Demethylation by the Estuarine Microbial Communities Obtained in Stable Hg Isotope Studies.

Authors:  Neusa Figueiredo; Maria Luísa Serralheiro; João Canário; Aida Duarte; Holger Hintelmann; Cristina Carvalho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.