Literature DB >> 16533837

Role of conserved glycines in pH gating of Kir1.1 (ROMK).

Henry Sackin1, Mikheil Nanazashvili, Lawrence G Palmer, Hui Li.   

Abstract

Gating of inward rectifier Kir1.1 potassium channels by internal pH is believed to occur when large hydrophobic leucines, on each of the four subunits, obstruct the permeation path at the cytoplasmic end of the inner transmembrane helices (TM2). In this study, we examined whether closure of the channel at this point involves bending of the inner helix at one or both of two highly conserved glycine residues (corresponding to G134 and G143 in KirBac1.1) that have been proposed as putative "gating hinges" for potassium channels. Replacement of these conserved inner helical glycines by less flexible alanines did not abolish gating but shifted the apparent pKa from 6.6 +/- 0.01 (wild-type) to 7.1 +/- 0.01 for G157A-Kir1.1b, and to 7.3 +/- 0.01 for G148A-Kir1.1b. When both glycines were mutated the effect was additive, shifting the pKa by 1.2 pH units to 7.8 +/- 0.04 for the double mutant: G157A+G148A. At this pKa, the double mutant would remain completely closed under physiological conditions. In contrast, when the glycine at G148 was replaced by a proline, the pKa was shifted in the opposite direction from 6.6 +/- 0.01 (wild-type) to 5.7 +/- 0.01 for G148P. Although conserved glycines at G148 and G157 made it significantly easier to open the channel, they were not an absolute requirement for pH gating in Kir1.1. In addition, none of the glycine mutants produced more than small changes in either the cell-attached or excised single-channel kinetics which, in this channel, argues against changes in the selectivity filter. The putative pH sensor at K61-Kir1.1b, (equivalent to K80-Kir1.1a) was also examined. Mutation of this lysine to an untitratable methionine did not abolish pH gating, but shifted the pKa into an acid range from 6.6 +/- 0.01 to 5.4 +/- 0.04, similar to pH gating in Kir2.1. Hence K61-Kir1.1b cannot function as the exclusive pH sensor for the channel, although it may act as one of multiple pH sensors, or as a link between a cytoplasmic sensor and the channel gate. K61-Kir1.1b also interacted differently with the two glycine mutations. Gating of the double mutant: K61M+G148A was indistinguishable from K61M alone, whereas gating of K61M+G157A was midway between the alkaline pKa of G157A and the acid pKa of K61M. Finally, closure of ROMK, G148A, G157A, and K61M all required the same L160-Kir1.1b residue at the cytoplasmic end of the inner transmembrane helix. Hence in wild-type and mutant channels, closure occurs by steric occlusion of the permeation path by four leucine side chains (L160-Kir1.1b) at the helix bundle crossing. This is facilitated by the conserved glycines on TM2, but pH gating in Kir1.1 does not absolutely require glycine hinges in this region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16533837      PMCID: PMC1440738          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.076653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  33 in total

1.  Blocker protection in the pore of a voltage-gated K+ channel and its structural implications.

Authors:  D del Camino; M Holmgren; Y Liu; G Yellen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  K(+)-dependent gating of K(ir)1.1 channels is linked to pH gating through a conformational change in the pore.

Authors:  U Schulte; S Weidemann; J Ludwig; J Ruppersberg; B Fakler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Subunit-subunit interactions are critical for proton sensitivity of ROMK: evidence in support of an intermolecular gating mechanism.

Authors:  Qiang Leng; Gordon G MacGregor; Ke Dong; Gerhard Giebisch; Steven C Hebert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity.

Authors:  D A Doyle; J Morais Cabral; R A Pfuetzner; A Kuo; J M Gulbis; S L Cohen; B T Chait; R MacKinnon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Regulation of ROMK by extracellular cations.

Authors:  H Sackin; S Syn; L G Palmer; H Choe; D E Walters
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate and intracellular pH regulate the ROMK1 potassium channel via separate but interrelated mechanisms.

Authors:  Y M Leung; W Z Zeng; H H Liou; C R Solaro; C L Huang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  pH gating of ROMK (K(ir)1.1) channels: control by an Arg-Lys-Arg triad disrupted in antenatal Bartter syndrome.

Authors:  U Schulte; H Hahn; M Konrad; N Jeck; C Derst; K Wild; S Weidemann; J P Ruppersberg; B Fakler; J Ludwig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  PKA site mutations of ROMK2 channels shift the pH dependence to more alkaline values.

Authors:  J Leipziger; G G MacGregor; G J Cooper; J Xu; S C Hebert; G Giebisch
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2000-11

9.  pH-dependent modulation of the cloned renal K+ channel, ROMK.

Authors:  C M McNicholas; G G MacGregor; L D Islas; Y Yang; S C Hebert; G Giebisch
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1998-12

10.  Permeation and gating of an inwardly rectifying potassium channel. Evidence for a variable energy well.

Authors:  H Choe; H Sackin; L G Palmer
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  13 in total

1.  A conserved arginine near the filter of Kir1.1 controls Rb/K selectivity.

Authors:  Henry Sackin; Mikheil Nanazashvili; Hui Li; Lawrence G Palmer; D Eric Walters
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Potassium-dependent activation of Kir4.2 K⁺ channels.

Authors:  Johan M Edvinsson; Anish J Shah; Lawrence G Palmer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Random mutagenesis screening indicates the absence of a separate H(+)-sensor in the pH-sensitive Kir channels.

Authors:  Jennifer J Paynter; Lijun Shang; Murali K Bollepalli; Thomas Baukrowitz; Stephen J Tucker
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of the renal potassium channel, ROMK, leads to type II Bartter syndrome.

Authors:  Brighid M O'Donnell; Timothy D Mackie; Arohan R Subramanya; Jeffrey L Brodsky
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  An intersubunit salt bridge near the selectivity filter stabilizes the active state of Kir1.1.

Authors:  Henry Sackin; Mikheil Nanazashvili; Hui Li; Lawrence G Palmer; D Eric Walters
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Modulation of Kir1.1 inactivation by extracellular Ca and Mg.

Authors:  Henry Sackin; Mikheil Nanazashvili; Hui Li; Lawrence G Palmer; Lei Yang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  External K activation of Kir1.1 depends on the pH gate.

Authors:  Henry Sackin; Mikheil Nanazashvili; Hui Li; Lawrence G Palmer; D Eric Walters
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  A comprehensive guide to the ROMK potassium channel: form and function in health and disease.

Authors:  Paul A Welling; Kevin Ho
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2009-05-20

9.  Putative re-entrant loop 1 of AE2 transmembrane domain has a major role in acute regulation of anion exchange by pH.

Authors:  Andrew K Stewart; Christine E Kurschat; Richard D Vaughan-Jones; Seth L Alper
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Long-pore electrostatics in inward-rectifier potassium channels.

Authors:  Janice L Robertson; Lawrence G Palmer; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.