Literature DB >> 16533349

Single-leg hop testing following fatiguing exercise: reliability and biomechanical analysis.

J Augustsson1, R Thomeé, C Lindén, M Folkesson, R Tranberg, J Karlsson.   

Abstract

A fatiguing exercise protocol was combined with single-leg hop testing to improve the possibilities of evaluating the effects of training or rehabilitation interventions. In the first test-retest experiment, 11 healthy male subjects performed two trials of single-leg hops under three different test conditions: non-fatigued and following fatiguing exercise, which consisted of unilateral weight machine knee extensions at 80% and 50%, respectively, of 1 repetition maximum (1 RM) strength. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.75 to 0.98 for different hop test conditions, indicating that all tests were reliable. For the second experiment, eight healthy male subjects performed the fatiguing exercise protocol to investigate how fatigue influences lower-extremity joint kinematics and kinetics during single-leg hops. Hip, knee and ankle joint angles, moments and powers, as well as ground-reaction forces were recorded with a six-camera, motion-capture system and a force platform. Recovery of hop performance following the fatiguing exercise was also measured. During the take-off for the single-leg hops, hip and knee flexion angles, generated powers for the knee and ankle joints, and ground-reaction forces decreased for the fatigued hop conditions compared with the non-fatigued condition (P<0.05). Compared with landing during the non-fatigued condition, hip moments and ground-reaction forces were lower for the fatigued hop conditions (P<0.05). The negative joint power was two to three times greater for the knee than for the hip and five to 10 times greater for the knee than for the ankle during landing for all test conditions (P<0.05). Most measured variables had recovered three minutes post-exercise. It is concluded that the fatiguing exercise protocol combined with single-leg hop testing was a reliable method for investigating functional performance under fatigued test conditions. Further, subjects utilized an adapted hop strategy, which employed less hip and knee flexion and generated powers for the knee and ankle joints during take-off, and less hip joint moments during landing under fatigued conditions. The large negative power values observed at the knee joint during the landing phase of the single-leg hop, during which the quadriceps muscle activates eccentrically, indicate that not only hop distance but also the ability to perform successful landings should be investigated when assessing dynamic knee function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16533349     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2005.00446.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  39 in total

Review 1.  Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Yonatan Kaplan; Joanna Kvist; Grethe Myklebust; May Arna Risberg; Daniel Theisen; Elias Tsepis; Suzanne Werner; Barbara Wondrasch; Erik Witvrouw
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Self-reported and performance-based outcomes following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction indicate successful improvements in knee stability after surgery despite remaining limitations in knee function.

Authors:  Maria Biesert; Anna Johansson; Ioannis Kostogiannis; David Roberts
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction.

Authors:  Camille Neeter; Alexander Gustavsson; Pia Thomeé; Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  High intensity running results in an impaired neuromuscular response in ACL reconstructed individuals.

Authors:  Kostas Patras; Giorgos Ziogas; Stavros Ristanis; Elias Tsepis; Nicholas Stergiou; Anastasios D Georgoulis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO THE REHABILITATION OF A COLLEGIATE FOOTBALL PLAYER FOLLOWING ANKLE FRACTURE: A CASE REPORT.

Authors:  Luis A Feigenbaum; Lee D Kaplan; Tony Musto; Ignacio A Gaunaurd; Robert S Gailey; William P Kelley; Timothy J Alemi; Braulio Espinosa; Eli Mandler; Vincent A Scavo; Dustin C West
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-06

6.  A novel clinical approach for assessing hop landing strategies: a 2D telescopic inverted pendulum (TIP) model.

Authors:  Robert Letchford; Kate Button; Paul Adamson; Paulien E Roos; Valerie Sparkes; Robert W M van Deursen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  PROSPECTIVE FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE TESTING AND RELATIONSHIP TO LOWER EXTREMITY INJURY INCIDENCE IN ADOLESCENT SPORTS PARTICIPANTS.

Authors:  Joseph Smith; Nick DePhillipo; Iris Kimura; Morgan Kocher; Ronald Hetzler
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-04

8.  Early versus late start of open kinetic chain quadriceps exercises after ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring grafts: a prospective randomized outcome study.

Authors:  Annette Heijne; Suzanne Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  RETURN TO PLAY PROGRESSION FOR RUGBY FOLLOWING INJURY TO THE LOWER EXTREMITY: A CLINICAL COMMENTARY AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.

Authors:  Michael P Sclafani; Chelseana C Davis
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-04

10.  Symmetry of squatting and the effect of fatigue following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Darren C Austin; Julian A Feller; Ross A Clark; Jodie A McClelland
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.