Stuart Du Pen1, Anna Du Pen, Jon Hillyer. 1. Overlake Pain Medicine Clinic, Overlake Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington 98004, USA. stuart.dupen@overlakehospital.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hydromorphone is often administered intrathecally for the treatment of cancer and nonmalignant chronic intractable pain. It is frequently utilized in combination with other analgesics in a multidrug intrathecal infusion; however, very little data are available documenting efficacy or safety of intrathecal hydromorphone as a solo analgesic. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to examine pain and side effects in patients receiving intrathecal hydromorphone. DESIGN: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients receiving intrathecal hydromorphone monotherapy in two large pain specialty practices in the Pacific Northwest. All data collected within 30 days of the patient's 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month anniversary of implant were analyzed. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients with noncancer-related chronic pain were included in the study. Thirteen patients had eligible pain data at 1 month, 10 patients had pain data at 3 months and seven patients had pain data available at 12 months after initiation of intrathecal hydromorphone. RESULTS: Average pain scores decreased significantly (P = 0.03). Side-effect and pain-interference scores remained essentially unchanged in this small sample of patients.
BACKGROUND:Hydromorphone is often administered intrathecally for the treatment of cancer and nonmalignant chronic intractable pain. It is frequently utilized in combination with other analgesics in a multidrug intrathecal infusion; however, very little data are available documenting efficacy or safety of intrathecal hydromorphone as a solo analgesic. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to examine pain and side effects in patients receiving intrathecal hydromorphone. DESIGN: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients receiving intrathecal hydromorphone monotherapy in two large pain specialty practices in the Pacific Northwest. All data collected within 30 days of the patient's 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month anniversary of implant were analyzed. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients with noncancer-related chronic pain were included in the study. Thirteen patients had eligible pain data at 1 month, 10 patients had pain data at 3 months and seven patients had pain data available at 12 months after initiation of intrathecal hydromorphone. RESULTS: Average pain scores decreased significantly (P = 0.03). Side-effect and pain-interference scores remained essentially unchanged in this small sample of patients.