Literature DB >> 16533128

Public reporting of provider performance: can its impact be made greater?

David L Robinowitz1, R Adams Dudley.   

Abstract

Public reporting of provider performance is becoming increasingly commonplace. In this chapter, we first review studies of prior public reports (or report cards) that show real but small impact on provider attempts to improve quality, on consumers' impressions of providers, and even on consumer selection of providers. Among other factors, two potential explanations for the low level of impact are that, in most early reports, the large majority of providers have been labeled "average" and consumers may have had difficulty understanding the statistical assessments. In response, some current report card producers are using or considering a variety of methods to increase the number of distinctions among providers and the ease of comprehension of the labels used. Therefore, we also consider the advantages and disadvantages of several novel approaches to analyzing and reporting provider performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16533128     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health        ISSN: 0163-7525            Impact factor:   21.981


  19 in total

1.  Estimating and reporting on the quality of inpatient stroke care by Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers.

Authors:  Greg Arling; Mathew Reeves; Joseph Ross; Linda S Williams; Salomeh Keyhani; Neale Chumbler; Michael S Phipps; Christianne Roumie; Laura J Myers; Amanda H Salanitro; Diana L Ordin; Jennifer Myers; Dawn M Bravata
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Meeting information needs to facilitate decision making: report cards for people with disabilities.

Authors:  Susan E Palsbo; Thilo Kroll
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Is there evidence of cream skimming among nursing homes following the publication of the Nursing Home Compare report card?

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Heather Ladd; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Jacqueline S Zinn
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-06-02

4.  Performance reporting to help organizations promote quality improvement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-11

Review 5.  Economic evaluation of pay-for-performance in health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Frank Eijkenaar; Heike Kemter; Adelheid Susanne Esslinger; Oliver Schöffski
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-10

6.  Differences in Hospital Risk-standardized Mortality Rates for Acute Myocardial Infarction When Assessed Using Transferred and Nontransferred Patients.

Authors:  Ian J Barbash; Hongwei Zhang; Derek C Angus; Steven E Reis; Chung-Chou H Chang; Francis R Pike; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Administrative data and the manitoba centre for health policy: some reflections.

Authors:  Noralou P Roos; Leslie L Roos; Jane Freemantle
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-01

8.  A field experiment on the impact of physician-level performance data on consumers' choice of physician.

Authors:  Steven C Martino; David E Kanouse; Marc N Elliott; Stephanie S Teleki; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Publication of quality report cards and trends in reported quality measures in nursing homes.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Heather Ladd; Jacqueline S Zinn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Extended length of stay after surgery: complications, inefficient practice, or sick patients?

Authors:  Robert W Krell; Micah E Girotti; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 14.766

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.