Literature DB >> 16531902

Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners.

Clare E Milner1, Reed Ferber, Christine D Pollard, Joseph Hamill, Irene S Davis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tibial stress fractures (TSF) are among the most serious running injuries, typically requiring 6-8 wk for recovery. This cross-sectional study was conducted to determine whether differences in structure and running mechanics exist between trained distance runners with a history of prior TSF and those who have never sustained a fracture.
METHODS: Female runners with a rearfoot strike pattern, aged between 18 and 45 yr and running at least 32 km.wk(-1), were recruited for this study. Participants in the study were 20 subjects with a history of TSF and 20 age- and mileage-matched control subjects with no previous lower extremity bony injuries. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected during overground running at 3.7 m.s(-1) using a six-camera motion capture system, force platform, and accelerometer. Variables of interest were vertical impact peak, instantaneous and average vertical loading rates, instantaneous and average loading rates during braking, knee flexion excursion, ankle and knee stiffness, and peak tibial shock. Tibial varum was measured in standing. Tibial area moment of inertia was calculated from tibial x-ray studies for a subset of runners.
RESULTS: The TSF group had significantly greater instantaneous and average vertical loading rates and tibial shock than the control group. The magnitude of tibial shock predicted group membership successfully in 70% of cases.
CONCLUSION: These data indicate that a history of TSF in runners is associated with increases in dynamic loading-related variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16531902     DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000183477.75808.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  111 in total

1.  A kinematic method for footstrike pattern detection in barefoot and shod runners.

Authors:  Allison R Altman; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  EFFECTS OF NORMAL AGING ON LOWER EXTREMITY LOADING AND COORDINATION DURING RUNNING IN MALES AND FEMALES.

Authors:  Paul W Kline; D S Blaise Williams
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-11

3.  Barefoot running: does it prevent injuries?

Authors:  Kelly Murphy; Emily J Curry; Elizabeth G Matzkin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Mechanical Fatigue of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Ground Reaction Force Waveforms in Running.

Authors:  Lindsay L Loundagin; Tannin A Schmidt; W Brent Edwards
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION AND INJURY PREVENTION STRATEGIES FOR THE ARMY PHYSICAL FITNESS TEST: TECHNIQUE MATTERS.

Authors:  Mark Thelen; Shane Koppenhaver
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-06

6.  RETURN TO RUNNING FOLLOWING A KNEE DISARTICULATION AMPUTATION: A CASE REPORT.

Authors:  Angela R Diebal-Lee; Robert S Kuenzi; Christopher A Rábago
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-08

7.  Update on stress fractures in female athletes: epidemiology, treatment, and prevention.

Authors:  Yin-Ting Chen; Adam S Tenforde; Michael Fredericson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-06

8.  Do novice runners have weak hips and bad running form?

Authors:  Anne Schmitz; Kelsey Russo; Lauren Edwards; Brian Noehren
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 9.  Gait Retraining: Altering the Fingerprint of Gait.

Authors:  Irene S Davis; Erin Futrell
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.784

Review 10.  An Evidence-Based Videotaped Running Biomechanics Analysis.

Authors:  Richard B Souza
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 1.784

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.