Literature DB >> 16530232

Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception.

Virginie van Wassenhove1, Ken W Grant, David Poeppel.   

Abstract

Forty-three normal hearing participants were tested in two experiments, which focused on temporal coincidence in auditory visual (AV) speech perception. In these experiments, audio recordings of/pa/and/ba/were dubbed onto video recordings of /ba/or/ga/, respectively (ApVk, AbVg), to produce the illusory "fusion" percepts /ta/, or /da/ [McGurk, H., & McDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-747]. In Experiment 1, an identification task using McGurk pairs with asynchronies ranging from -467 ms (auditory lead) to +467 ms was conducted. Fusion responses were prevalent over temporal asynchronies from -30 ms to +170 ms and more robust for audio lags. In Experiment 2, simultaneity judgments for incongruent and congruent audiovisual tokens (AdVd, AtVt) were collected. McGurk pairs were more readily judged as asynchronous than congruent pairs. Characteristics of the temporal window over which simultaneity and fusion responses were maximal were quite similar, suggesting the existence of a 200 ms duration asymmetric bimodal temporal integration window.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16530232     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  199 in total

1.  Developmental Shifts in Detection and Attention for Auditory, Visual, and Audiovisual Speech.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Markus F Damian; Cassandra Karl; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The cross-modal spread of attention reveals differential constraints for the temporal and spatial linking of visual and auditory stimulus events.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Kenneth C Roberts; Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Multistability, cross-modal binding and the additivity of conjoined grouping principles.

Authors:  Michael Kubovy; Minhong Yu
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Some behavioral and neurobiological constraints on theories of audiovisual speech integration: a review and suggestions for new directions.

Authors:  Nicholas Altieri; David B Pisoni; James T Townsend
Journal:  Seeing Perceiving       Date:  2011-09-29

5.  Multistage audiovisual integration of speech: dissociating identification and detection.

Authors:  Kasper Eskelund; Jyrki Tuomainen; Tobias S Andersen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Semantic congruency but not temporal synchrony enhances long-term memory performance for audio-visual scenes.

Authors:  Hauke S Meyerhoff; Markus Huff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

7.  The sound and the fury: Late positive potential is sensitive to sound affect.

Authors:  Darin R Brown; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Aging Impairs Temporal Sensitivity, but not Perceptual Synchrony, Across Modalities.

Authors:  Alexandra N Scurry; Tiziana Vercillo; Alexis Nicholson; Michael Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.286

9.  Surmising synchrony of sound and sight: Factors explaining variance of audiovisual integration in hurdling, tap dancing and drumming.

Authors:  Nina Heins; Jennifer Pomp; Daniel S Kluger; Stefan Vinbrüx; Ima Trempler; Axel Kohler; Katja Kornysheva; Karen Zentgraf; Markus Raab; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neural processing of asynchronous audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Nicholas A Altieri; Sunah Kim; David B Pisoni; Thomas W James
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.