Literature DB >> 16530231

The effect of low arousal on visuo-spatial attention.

B Fimm1, K Willmes, W Spijkers.   

Abstract

Clinical and experimental evidence suggests a special role of the right hemisphere for alerting and orienting. However, it is not clear whether these attentional aspects should be taken to be independent or interacting. At least on the functional neuroanatomical level there seems to be an overlap in right parietal and frontal cortical structures. In this sleep deprivation study we examined the effect of different levels of arousal on covert orienting of attention repeatedly over a period of 28 h in 11 healthy subjects. The main finding is a disproportionate and significant slowing of responses to stimuli presented to the left visual hemifield that could only be observed in a state of maximally reduced arousal at 5:00 a.m. Furthermore, a facilitation of attentional shifts to the right could be observed in invalid trials when attention had to be reoriented. These results suggest an interaction of arousal and orienting, at least in situations of maximally reduced activation when attentional asymmetries could be provoked even in healthy subjects. The findings are compatible with a right hemisphere dominance for alerting and orienting, and they are discussed in the light of theoretical accounts of visual orienting.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16530231     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  19 in total

1.  Asymmetries in attention as revealed by fixations and saccades.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues.

Authors:  Yamaya Sosa; Aaron M Clarke; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Poor vigilance affects attentional orienting triggered by central uninformative gaze and arrow cues.

Authors:  Andrea Marotta; Diana Martella; Lisa Maccari; Mara Sebastiani; Maria Casagrande
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-04-10

4.  Alerting, orienting and executive control: the effects of sleep deprivation on attentional networks.

Authors:  Diana Martella; Maria Casagrande; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Monotonous driving induces shifts in spatial attention as a function of handedness.

Authors:  D Chandrakumar; S Coussens; H A D Keage; S Banks; J Dorrian; T Loetscher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Gemma Learmonth; Aodhan Gallagher; Jamie Gibson; Gregor Thut; Monika Harvey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.

Authors:  Christopher S Y Benwell; Monika Harvey; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  A rightward shift in the visuospatial attention vector with healthy aging.

Authors:  Christopher S Y Benwell; Gregor Thut; Ashley Grant; Monika Harvey
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Statistical learning as a tool for rehabilitation in spatial neglect.

Authors:  Albulena Shaqiri; Britt Anderson; James Danckert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Losing the left side of the world: rightward shift in human spatial attention with sleep onset.

Authors:  Corinne A Bareham; Tom Manly; Olga V Pustovaya; Sophie K Scott; Tristan A Bekinschtein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.