Literature DB >> 16528646

Development of a video assessment scoring method to determine the accuracy of endoscopist performance at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

S Thomas-Gibson1, P A Rogers, N Suzuki, M E Vance, M D Rutter, D Swain, A J Nicholls, B P Saunders, W Atkin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Variation in the adenoma detection rate (ADR) at flexible sigmoidoscopy screening has been shown to be due to variation in endoscopist performance. There are no objective methods for scoring an endoscopist's performance reliably, and the aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable objective scoring method using video footage of screening flexible sigmoidoscopies.
METHODS: In a series of five experiments, experienced endoscopists (the scorers) independently scored a sample (n = 43) of the 40 000 flexible sigmoidoscopy extubations recorded as part of the United Kingdom Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial (UK FSST). The scoring system, the parameters scored, and their definitions evolved over the course of the five experiments. The initial visual analogue score (range 0-100) used in the first two experiments evolved into a five-point score that ranged from 1 (E, poor) to 5 (A, excellent) in the last three experiments. The final parameters scored were: time spent viewing the mucosa, re-examination of poorly viewed areas, suctioning of fluid pools, distension of the lumen, lower rectal examination, and overall quality of the examination. The first four experiments scored one individual case per endoscopist; in experiment 5, an overall score was awarded for five cases performed by each endoscopist being assessed.
RESULTS: Scoring five cases examined by an individual endoscopist using the A-E grading system was the most reliable method (interclass correlation coefficient 0.89). Cluster analysis demonstrated that the endoscopists in the high-scoring ADR group (ADR 14.7-15.9 %) could be differentiated from those in the intermediate- and low-scoring ADR groups (ADR 8.6-12.6 %).
CONCLUSIONS: An objective scoring system for assessing the accuracy of performance at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy, based on video footage, is described. Endoscopists who might benefit from further training can be identified using this method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16528646     DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  4 in total

1.  Using motion capture to assess colonoscopy experience level.

Authors:  Morten Bo Svendsen; Louise Preisler; Jens Georg Hillingsoe; Lars Bo Svendsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-05-16

2.  Patient interest in video recording of colonoscopy: a survey.

Authors:  Meghana Raghavendra; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Meticulous cecal image documentation at colonoscopy is associated with improved polyp detection.

Authors:  Mo Hameed Thoufeeq; Bjorn Joakim Rembacken
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-09-15

4.  Peer evaluation and feedback for invasive medical procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Theresa Thai; Diana K N Louden; Rosemary Adamson; Jason A Dominitz; Jacob A Doll
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.263

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.