Literature DB >> 16528520

Ascertainment adjustment in genetic studies of ordinal traits.

Rui Feng1, Heping Zhang.   

Abstract

Most genetic studies recruit high risk families and the discoveries are based on non-random selected groups. We must consider the consequences of this ascertainment process in order to apply the results of genetic research to the general population. In previous reports, we developed a latent variable model to assess the familial aggregation and inheritability of ordinal-scaled diseases, and found a major gene component of alcoholism after applying the model to the data from the Yale family study of comorbidity of alcoholism and anxiety (YFSCAA). In this report, we examine the ascertainment effects on parameter estimates and correct potential bias in the latent variable model. The simulation studies for various ascertainment schemes suggest that our ascertainment adjustment is necessary and effective. We also find that the estimated effects are relatively unbiased for the particular ascertainment scheme used in the YFSCAA, which assures the validity of our earlier conclusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16528520     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-006-0147-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  9 in total

1.  Ascertainment adjustment: where does it take us?

Authors:  P R Burton; L J Palmer; K Jacobs; K J Keen; J M Olson; R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-11-14       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Ascertainment-adjusted parameter estimates revisited.

Authors:  Michael P Epstein; Xihong Lin; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  General models for segregation analysis.

Authors:  R C Elston; K C Yelverton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Linkage analysis of ordinal traits for pedigree data.

Authors:  Rui Feng; James F Leckman; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ascertainment corrections based on smaller family units.

Authors:  G E Bonney
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. I. Theory.

Authors:  W J Ewens; N C Shute
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Sampling considerations in the gathering and analysis of pedigree data.

Authors:  R C Elston; E Sobel
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  A frailty model of segregation analysis: understanding the familial transmission of alcoholism.

Authors:  H Zhang; K Merikangas
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Familial transmission of substance use disorders.

Authors:  K R Merikangas; M Stolar; D E Stevens; J Goulet; M A Preisig; B Fenton; H Zhang; S S O'Malley; B J Rounsaville
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1998-11
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  LOT: a tool for linkage analysis of ordinal traits for pedigree data.

Authors:  Meizhuo Zhang; Rui Feng; Xiang Chen; Buqu Hu; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 6.937

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.