Literature DB >> 16528420

Airborne exposure and biological monitoring of bar and restaurant workers before and after the introduction of a smoking ban.

Dag G Ellingsen1, Geir Fladseth, Hanne L Daae, Merete Gjølstad, Kristina Kjaerheim, Marit Skogstad, Raymond Olsen, Syvert Thorud, Paal Molander.   

Abstract

The aims were to assess the impact of a total smoking ban on the level of airborne contaminants and the urinary cotinine levels in the employees in bars and restaurants. In a follow up design, 13 bars and restaurants were visited before and after the implementation of a smoking ban. Ninety-three employees in the establishments were initially included into the study. The arithmetic mean concentration of nicotine and total dust declined from 28.3 microg m(-3) (range, 0.4-88.0) and 262 microg m(-3) (range, 52-662), respectively, to 0.6 microg m(-3) (range, not detected-3.7) and 77 microg m(-3) (range, not detected-261) after the smoking ban. The Pearson correlation coefficient between airborne nicotine and total dust was 0.86 (p < 0.001; n = 48). The post-shift geometric mean urinary cotinine concentration declined from 9.5 microg g(-1) creatinine (cr) (95% CI 6.5-13.7) to 1.4 microg g(-1) cr (95% CI 0.8-2.5) after the ban (p < 0.001) in 25 non-snuffing non-smokers. A reduction from 1444 microg g(-1) cr (95% CI 957-2180) to 688 microg g(-1) cr (95% CI 324-1458) was found (p < 0.05) in 29 non-snuffing smokers. The urinary cotinine levels increased from 11.7 microg g(-1) cr (95% CI 7.0-19.6) post-shift to 21.9 microg g(-1) cr (95% CI 13.3-36.3) (p < 0.01) in the next morning in 24 non-snuffing non-smokers before the smoking ban. A substantial reduction of airborne nicotine and total dust was observed after the introduction of a smoking ban in bars and restaurants. The urinary cotinine levels were reduced in non-smokers. The decline found in smokers may suggest a reduction in the amount of smoking after intervention. In non-smokers cotinine concentrations were higher based on urine sampled the morning after a shift than based on urine sampled immediately post-shift.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16528420     DOI: 10.1039/b600050a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Monit        ISSN: 1464-0325


  29 in total

1.  Mechanical systems versus smoking bans for secondhand smoke control.

Authors:  Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez; Benjamin C Amick; David Gimeno; Luz M Reynales-Shigematsu; George L Delclos; Ronald B Harrist; Steven H Kelder; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Mauricio Hernandez-Ávila
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Secondhand smoke levels in Scottish pubs: the effect of smoke-free legislation.

Authors:  Sean Semple; Karen S Creely; Audrey Naji; Brian G Miller; Jon G Ayres
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Exposure to fine and ultrafine particles from secondhand smoke in public places before and after the smoking ban, Italy 2005.

Authors:  Pasquale Valente; Francesco Forastiere; Antonella Bacosi; Giorgio Cattani; Simonetta Di Carlo; Monica Ferri; Irene Figà-Talamanca; Achille Marconi; Luigi Paoletti; Carlo Perucci; Piergiorgio Zuccaro
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Cross shift changes in lung function among bar and restaurant workers before and after implementation of a smoking ban.

Authors:  M Skogstad; K Kjaerheim; G Fladseth; M Gjølstad; H L Daae; R Olsen; P Molander; D G Ellingsen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Tobacco smoke exposure in nonsmoking hospitality workers before and after a state smoking ban.

Authors:  Joni A Jensen; Barbara A Schillo; Molly M Moilanen; Bruce R Lindgren; Sharon Murphy; Steven Carmella; Stephen S Hecht; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Air contamination due to smoking in German restaurants, bars, and other venues--before and after the implementation of a partial smoking ban.

Authors:  Florian Gleich; Ute Mons; Martina Pötschke-Langer
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Excessive exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke among hospitality workers in Kyrgyzstan.

Authors:  Denis Vinnikov; Nurlan Brimkulov; Shahida Shahrir; Patrick Breysse; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Quantification of ETS exposure in hospitality workers who have never smoked.

Authors:  Stefanie Kolb; Ulrike Brückner; Dennis Nowak; Katja Radon
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Secondhand tobacco smoke exposure in selected public places (PM2.5 and air nicotine) and non-smoking employees (hair nicotine) in Ghana.

Authors:  Wilfred Agbenyikey; Edith Wellington; John Gyapong; Mark J Travers; Patrick N Breysse; Kathleen M McCarty; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to second-hand smoke and respiratory health in hospitality workers: a cohort study.

Authors:  Esteve Fernández; Marcela Fu; José A Pascual; María J López; Mónica Pérez-Ríos; Anna Schiaffino; Jose M Martínez-Sánchez; Carles Ariza; Esteve Saltó; Manel Nebot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.