Literature DB >> 16528138

A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, flexible-dose study to evaluate the tolerability, efficacy and effects of treatment discontinuation with escitalopram and paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorder.

David S Baldwin1, James A Cooper, Anna K T Huusom, Ian Hindmarch.   

Abstract

This multinational, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose study evaluated the short- and long-term antidepressant tolerability and efficacy of escitalopram and paroxetine. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring adverse events throughout the study, and discontinuation events during brief treatment interruption and tapered withdrawal. Discontinuation-emergent effects were evaluated in two separate double-blind periods. First, to mimic the consequences of non-compliance, patients were randomized to one of two treatment interruption periods (placebo-substitution for 3-5 days). Second, patients were randomized to a 1-2-week tapered withdrawal period randomly scheduled between weeks 28 and 31. The pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from baseline in total Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score at week 8, using the principle of last observation carried forward. A total of 323 patients entered 8 weeks of double-blind treatment and received at least one flexible dose of escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) or paroxetine (20-40 mg/day). Patients who demonstrated evidence of a significant clinical improvement (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement of 1 or 2) at week 8 entered a 19-week, double-blind maintenance period during which they were treated with the same dose they received at week 8, followed by a 1-2-week tapered withdrawal period. A total of 89 patients (28%) withdrew during the study; significantly (P<0.01) more patients withdrew from the paroxetine group (34%) than from the escitalopram group (21%), and significantly (P<0.05) more paroxetine patients withdrew due to lack of efficacy. The mean MADRS total score improved for both treatment groups from baseline to week 8, with no statistical difference between groups. In severely depressed patients (baseline MADRS total score >or=30), escitalopram was superior (P<0.05) to paroxetine at week 27 (end of maintenance treatment). There was a high prevalence of sexual dysfunction at baseline: the mean Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) score was approximately 20 points in both treatment groups. Mean total ASEX scores increased slightly above baseline values during the acute period and declined slightly below baseline values towards the end of the maintenance period. During taper and cessation of treatment, patients in the paroxetine group demonstrated significantly more discontinuation symptoms relative to escitalopram based on the Discontinuation Emergent Signs and Symptoms scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16528138     DOI: 10.1097/01.yic.0000194377.88330.1d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0268-1315            Impact factor:   1.659


  21 in total

Review 1.  How should primary care doctors select which antidepressants to administer?

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Kylie Thaler; Seth Hill; Richard A Hansen
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose study.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Ou; Guang-Lei Xun; Ren-Rong Wu; Le-Hua Li; Mao-Sheng Fang; Hong-Geng Zhang; Shi-Ping Xie; Jian-Guo Shi; Bo Du; Xue-Qin Yuan; Jing-Ping Zhao
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Antidepressant Withdrawal and Rebound Phenomena.

Authors:  Jonathan Henssler; Andreas Heinz; Lasse Brandt; Tom Bschor
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of New Generation Antidepressants.

Authors:  Ai Leng Khoo; Hui Jun Zhou; Monica Teng; Liang Lin; Ying Jiao Zhao; Lay Beng Soh; Yee Ming Mok; Boon Peng Lim; Kok Peng Gwee
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Sexual dysfunction associated with second-generation antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder: results from a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ursula Reichenpfader; Gerald Gartlehner; Laura C Morgan; Amy Greenblatt; Barbara Nussbaumer; Richard A Hansen; Megan Van Noord; Linda Lux; Bradley N Gaynes
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Symptom-Onset Dosing of Sertraline for the Treatment of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kimberly A Yonkers; Susan G Kornstein; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Brian Merry; Kari Van Steenburgh; Margaret Altemus
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 21.596

7.  Incidence and Timing of Taper/Posttherapy-Emergent Adverse Events Following Discontinuation of Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Philip T Ninan; Jeff Musgnung; Michael Messig; Gina Buckley; Christine J Guico-Pabia; Tanya S Ramey
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2015-02-05

Review 8.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for unipolar depression: a systematic review of classic long-term randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Dorian Deshauer; David Moher; Dean Fergusson; Ester Moher; Margaret Sampson; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for depression.

Authors:  Andrea Cipriani; Claudio Santilli; Toshi A Furukawa; Alessandra Signoretti; Atsuo Nakagawa; Hugh McGuire; Rachel Churchill; Corrado Barbui
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

10.  Early discontinuation of antidepressant treatment and suicide risk among persons aged 50 and over: a population-based register study.

Authors:  Annette Erlangsen; Esben Agerbo; Keith Hawton; Yeates Conwell
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 4.839

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.