Literature DB >> 16527710

Prospective analysis of office-based hysteroscopic sterilization.

Mark D Levie1, Scott G Chudnoff.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of performing the Essure hysteroscopic sterilization in an office-based setting.
DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).
SETTING: University out-patient office. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing permanent sterilization in our outpatient office who opted for hysteroscopic sterilization were included.
INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopic placement of the Essure device in an office-based setting with only non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs and paracervical block.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multiple data points were collected on each patient including demographic data, specific procedural information, and 12-week hysterosalpingogram data. Most of our patients were Hispanic and had an average body mass index of 30.3. Average time to perform the procedure was 12.4 minutes, with the steepest improvement in the first 13 cases. Bilateral placement of the device was successful in 98 (96%) of 102 patients. Of these patients 92 have 12-week hysterosalpingography results (6 patients were lost to follow-up), with 90 (98%) showing bilateral tubal occlusion. There were no intraprocedural or postprocedural complications.
CONCLUSION: In our institution and in our experience, office-hysteroscopic placement of the Essure device is a feasible and effective approach for permanent sterilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16527710     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  7 in total

1.  Transcervical sterilization: a comparison of essure(r) permanent birth control system and adiana(r) permanent contraception system.

Authors:  Sophia N Palmer; James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

2.  Incidence and risk factors for chronic pelvic pain after hysteroscopic sterilization.

Authors:  Amanda C Yunker; Jessica M B Ritch; Erica F Robinson; Cara T Golish
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Adherence to hysterosalpingogram appointments following hysteroscopic sterilization among low-income women.

Authors:  Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Tubal risk markers for failure to place transcervical sterilization coils.

Authors:  Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Mahta Rouhani; Mahbubur Rahman; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 5.  A Meta-Analysis of Bilateral Essure® Procedural Placement Success Rates on First Attempt.

Authors:  Gabriel Frietze; Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Mahbubur Rahman; Mahta Rouhani; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 6.  Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  K McMartin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2013-10-01

7.  Efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the Essure™ procedure.

Authors:  Collette R Lessard; Matthew R Hopkins
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.711

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.