Literature DB >> 16526575

Screw vs cement-implant-retained restorations: an experimental study in the beagle. Part 2. Immunohistochemical evaluation of the peri-implant tissues.

Bartolomeo Assenza1, Luciano Artese, Antonio Scarano, Corrado Rubini, Vittoria Perrotti, Maurizio Piattelli, Ulf Thams, Fidel San Roman, Marcello Piccirilli, Adriano Piattelli.   

Abstract

Crestal bone loss has been reported to occur around dental implants. Even if the causes of this bone loss are not completely understood, the presence of a microgap between implant and abutment with a possible contamination of the internal portion of the implants has been suggested. The aim of this study was to see if there were differences in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression, microvessel density (MVD), proliferative activity (MIB-1), and inflammatory infiltrate in the soft tissues around implants with screwed and cemented abutments. Sandblasted and acid-etched implants were inserted in the mandibles of 6 Beagle dogs. Ten 3.5- x 10-mm root-form implants were inserted in each mandible. A total of 60 implants (30 with screwed abutments and 30 with cemented abutments) were used. After 12 months, all the bridges were removed and all abutments were checked for mobility. A total of 8 loosened screws (27%) were found in the screwed abutments, whereas no loosening was observed in cemented abutments. A gingival biopsy was performed in 8 implants with cemented abutments, in 8 implants with screwed abutments, and in 8 implants with unscrewed abutments. No statistically significant differences were found in the inflammatory infiltrate and in the MIB-1 among the different groups. No statistically significant difference was found in the MVD between screwed and cemented abutments (P = .2111), whereas there was a statistically significant difference in MVD between screwed and unscrewed abutments (P = .0277) and between cemented and unscrewed abutments (P = .0431). A low intensity of VEGF was prevalent in screwed and in cemented abutments, whereas a high intensity of VEGF was prevalent in unscrewed abutments. These facts could be explained by the effects induced, in the abutments that underwent a screw loosening, by the presence of bacteria inside the hollow portion of the implants or by enhanced reparative processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16526575     DOI: 10.1563/754.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  5 in total

1.  Peri-Implant Bone Resorption during Healing Abutment Placement: The Effect of a 0.20% Chlorhexidine Gel vs. Placebo-A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Human Study.

Authors:  Bruna Sinjari; Gianmaria D'Addazio; Ilaria De Tullio; Tonino Traini; Sergio Caputi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Mechanical Pull-Out Test of a New Hybrid Fixture-Abutment Connection: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Gianmaria D'Addazio; Bruna Sinjari; Lorenzo Arcuri; Beatrice Femminella; Giovanna Murmura; Manlio Santilli; Sergio Caputi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Esthetic Evaluation and Acceptability of Different Hole Designs on Implant Crowns from the Perspective of Patients and Dentists in China.

Authors:  Cai Wen; Rong Jiang; Zhiqiang Zhang; Bo Lei; Yingquan Zhong; Huangjun Zhou
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  A 4 Year Human, Randomized, Radiographic Study of Scalloped versus Non-Scalloped Cemented Implants.

Authors:  Bruna Sinjari; Gianmaria D'Addazio; Manlio Santilli; Barbara D'Avanzo; Imena Rexhepi; Antonio Scarano; Tonino Traini; Maurizio Piattelli; Sergio Caputi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Cemented versus screw-retained zirconia-based single-implant restorations: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Sofia T Lamperti; Karin Wolleb; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Jürg Hüsler; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.021

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.