Literature DB >> 16526508

Patterns of sperm precedence are not affected by female mating history in Drosophila melanogaster.

Edward H Morrow1, Andrew D Stewart, William R Rice.   

Abstract

In promiscuously mating species, there is strong selection on males to maximize their share of paternity through both defensive and offensive means. This has been most extensively examined using the Drosophila melanogaster model system. In these studies, sperm competition has been examined by mating a virgin female to two consecutive males and then determining the fertilization success of both the first male (defending, P1) and the second male (offending, P2). Recent evidence suggests that male defense may be influenced by female mating history (i.e., virgin versus nonvirgin). Here, by mating females to males with three different genotypes, we show that female mating history does not affect male defensive or offensive abilities in sperm competition. We also show that, although female lifetime fecundity was not correlated with the number of times that she mated, it was reduced by increased exposure to males. These data indicate that measures of P1 and P2 previously reported in D. melanogaster may be robust to the specific mating history of the females used in these studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16526508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

1.  Drosophila melanogaster females change mating behaviour and offspring production based on social context.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Billeter; Samyukta Jagadeesh; Nancy Stepek; Reza Azanchi; Joel D Levine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Partitioning sexual selection into its mating success and fertilization success components.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; William R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Assessing sexual conflict in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.

Authors:  William R Rice; Andrew D Stewart; Edward H Morrow; Jodell E Linder; Nicole Orteiza; Phillip G Byrne
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Remating in Drosophila melanogaster: are indirect benefits condition dependent?

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; Alison Pischedda; William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Complex interactions with females and rival males limit the evolution of sperm offence and defence.

Authors:  Adam Bjork; William T Starmer; Dawn M Higginson; Christopher J Rhodes; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sexual selection can partly explain low frequencies of Segregation Distorter alleles.

Authors:  Thomas A Keaney; Therésa M Jones; Luke Holman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  Variation in the post-mating fitness landscape in fruit flies.

Authors:  C Fricke; T Chapman
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Oh, the places they'll go: Female sperm storage and sperm precedence in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sandra L Schnakenberg; Mark L Siegal; Margaret C Bloch Qazi
Journal:  Spermatogenesis       Date:  2012-07-01

9.  Inbreeding reveals mode of past selection on male reproductive characters in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Outi Ala-Honkola; David J Hosken; Mollie K Manier; Stefan Lüpold; Elizabeth M Droge-Young; Kirstin S Berben; William F Collins; John M Belote; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Last male sperm precedence is modulated by female remating rate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Meghan Laturney; Roel van Eijk; Jean-Christophe Billeter
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2018-04-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.