Literature DB >> 16524583

Structural and nanoindentation studies of stem cell-based tissue-engineered bone.

Gadi Pelled1, Kuangshin Tai, Dima Sheyn, Yoram Zilberman, Sangamesh Kumbar, Lakshmi S Nair, Cato T Laurencin, Dan Gazit, Christine Ortiz.   

Abstract

Stem cell-based gene therapy and tissue engineering have been shown to be an efficient method for the regeneration of critical-sized bone defects. Despite being an area of active research over the last decade, no knowledge of the intrinsic ultrastructural and nanomechanical properties of such bone tissue exists. In this study, we report the nanomechanical properties of engineered bone tissue derived from genetically modified mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) overexpressing the rhBMP2 gene, grown in vivo in the thigh muscle of immunocompetent mice for 4 weeks, compared to femoral bone adjacent to the transplantation site. The two types of bone had similar mineral contents (61 and 65 wt% for engineered and femoral bone, respectively), overall microstructures showing lacunae and canaliculi (both measured by back-scattered electron microscopy), chemical compositions (measured by energy dispersive X-ray analysis), and nanoscale topographical morphologies (measured by tapping-mode atomic force microscopy imaging or TMAFM). Nanoindentation experiments revealed that the small length scale mechanical properties were statistically different with the femoral bone (indented parallel to the bone long axis) being stiffer and harder (apparent elastic modulus, E approximately 27.3+/-10.5 GPa and hardness, H approximately 1.0+/-0.7G Pa) than the genetically engineered bone (E approximately 19.8+/-5.6 GPa, H approximately 0.9+/-0.4G Pa). TMAFM imaging showed clear residual indents characteristic of viscoelastic plastic deformation for both types of bone. However, fine differences in the residual indent area (smaller for the engineered bone), pile up (smaller for the engineered bone), and fracture mechanisms (microcracks for the engineered bone) were observed with the genetically engineered bone behaving more brittle than the femoral control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16524583     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

1.  Microcomputed tomography-based structural analysis of various bone tissue regeneration models.

Authors:  Ilan Kallai; Olga Mizrahi; Wafa Tawackoli; Zulma Gazit; Gadi Pelled; Dan Gazit
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Creation of new bone by the percutaneous injection of human bone marrow stromal cell and HA/TCP suspensions.

Authors:  Mahesh H Mankani; Sergei A Kuznetsov; Grayson W Marshall; Pamela Gehron Robey
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  Direct gene therapy for bone regeneration: gene delivery, animal models, and outcome measures.

Authors:  Gadi Pelled; Ayelet Ben-Arav; Colleen Hock; David G Reynolds; Cemal Yazici; Yoram Zilberman; Zulma Gazit; Hani Awad; Dan Gazit; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of regenerating long bone by nanoindentation.

Authors:  Takuya Ishimoto; Takayoshi Nakano; Masaya Yamamoto; Yasuhiko Tabata
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Genetically modified mesenchymal stem cells induce mechanically stable posterior spine fusion.

Authors:  Dima Sheyn; Martin Rüthemann; Olga Mizrahi; Ilan Kallai; Yoram Zilberman; Wafa Tawackoli; Linda E A Kanim; Li Zhao; Hyun Bae; Gadi Pelled; Jess G Snedeker; Dan Gazit
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Characterization of indentation response and stiffness reduction of bone using a continuum damage model.

Authors:  Jingzhou Zhang; Michelle M Michalenko; Ellen Kuhl; Timothy C Ovaert
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2009-08-11

7.  Bone-chip system to monitor osteogenic differentiation using optical imaging.

Authors:  Dmitriy Sheyn; Doron Cohn-Yakubovich; Shiran Ben-David; Sandra De Mel; Virginia Chan; Christopher Hinojosa; Norman Wen; Geraldine A Hamilton; Dan Gazit; Zulma Gazit
Journal:  Microfluid Nanofluidics       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 2.529

Review 8.  Optical spectroscopy for noninvasive monitoring of stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Andrew Downes; Rabah Mouras; Alistair Elfick
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-02-16

9.  Topographic mapping and compression elasticity analysis of skinned cardiac muscle fibers in vitro with atomic force microscopy and nanoindentation.

Authors:  Jie Zhu; Tanya Sabharwal; Aruna Kalyanasundaram; Lianhong Guo; Guodong Wang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Study of Osteoclast Adhesion to Cortical Bone Surfaces: A Correlative Microscopy Approach for Concomitant Imaging of Cellular Dynamics and Surface Modifications.

Authors:  Michal Shemesh; Sefi Addadi; Yonat Milstein; Benjamin Geiger; Lia Addadi
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 9.229

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.