Literature DB >> 16524151

The future of the perfusion record: automated data collection vs. manual recording.

Jane Ottens1, Robert A Baker, Richard F Newland, Annette Mazzone.   

Abstract

The perfusion record, whether manually recorded or computer generated, is a legal representation of the procedure. The handwritten perfusion record has been the most common method of recording events that occur during cardiopulmonary bypass. This record is of significant contrast to the integrated data management systems available that provide continuous collection of data automatically or by means of a few keystrokes. Additionally, an increasing number of monitoring devices are available to assist in the management of patients on bypass. These devices are becoming more complex and provide more data for the perfusionist to monitor and record. Most of the data from these can be downloaded automatically into online data management systems, allowing more time for the perfusionist to concentrate on the patient while simultaneously producing a more accurate record. In this prospective report, we compared 17 cases that were recorded using both manual and electronic data collection techniques. The perfusionist in charge of the case recorded the perfusion using the manual technique while a second perfusionist entered relevant events on the electronic record generated by the Stockert S3 Data Management System/Data Bahn (Munich, Germany). Analysis of the two types of perfusion records showed significant variations in the recorded information. Areas that showed the most inconsistency included measurement of the perfusion pressures, flow, blood temperatures, cardioplegia delivery details, and the recording of events, with the electronic record superior in the integrity of the data. In addition, the limitations of the electronic system were also shown by the lack of electronic gas flow data in our hardware. Our results confirm the importance of accurate methods of recording of perfusion events. The use of an automated system provides the opportunity to minimize transcription error and bias. This study highlights the limitation of spot recording of perfusion events in the overall record keeping for perfusion management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16524151      PMCID: PMC4680825     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  3 in total

1.  Differences between handwritten and automatic blood pressure records.

Authors:  R I Cook; J S McDonald; E Nunziata
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Computerized data collection in the operating room during coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison to the hand-written anesthesia record.

Authors:  J P Hollenberg; P A Pirraglia; P Williams-Russo; G S Hartman; J P Gold; F S Yao; S J Thomas
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Are automated anesthesia records better?

Authors:  D N Thrush
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 9.452

  3 in total
  9 in total

1.  Developing a benchmarking process in perfusion: a report of the Perfusion Downunder Collaboration.

Authors:  Robert A Baker; Richard F Newland; Carmel Fenton; Michael McDonald; Timothy W Willcox; Alan F Merry
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

2.  Perfusion Electronic Record Documentation Using Epic Systems Software.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Riley; George A Justison
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2015-12

3.  Electronic data processing: the pathway to automated quality control of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  R F Newland; R A Baker; R Stanley
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2006-06

4.  Transcribed oxygen saturation vs oximeter recordings in very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  T L Ruiz; J M Trzaski; D W Sink; J I Hagadorn
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Improving cardiopulmonary bypass: does continuous blood gas monitoring have a role to play?

Authors:  Jane Ottens; Sigrid C Tuble; Andrew J Sanderson; John L Knight; Robert A Baker
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2010-09

6.  The Perfusion Downunder collaborative database project.

Authors:  Richard Newland; Robert A Baker; Rebecca Stanley; Katherine Place; Timothy W Willcox
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2008-09

7.  Perfusion quality improvement and the reduction of clinical variability.

Authors:  Alfred H Stammers; Cody C Trowbridge; James Pezzuto; Alfred Casale
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2009-12

8.  Comparison of current practices of cardiopulmonary perfusion technology in Iran with American Society of Extracorporeal Technology's standards.

Authors:  Amir Faravan; Nooredin Mohammadi; Alireza Alizadeh Ghavidel; Mohammad Zia Toutounchi; Ameneh Ghanbari; Mehran Mazloomi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2016-06-28

9.  Continuous ultrafiltration during extracorporeal circulation and its effect on lactatemia: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carlos García-Camacho; Antonio-Jesús Marín-Paz; Carolina Lagares-Franco; María-José Abellán-Hervás; Ana-María Sáinz-Otero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.