Literature DB >> 16519546

Cost effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal women after adjuvant tamoxifen therapy: the UK perspective.

Jonathan Karnon1, Thomas Delea, Stephen R D Johnston, Robert Smith, Jane Brandman, Jennifer Sung, Paul E Goss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MA17 was a randomised placebo-controlled trial of letrozole 2.5 mg/day in 5187 estrogen receptor-positive, 50% node-negative, postmenopausal women (median age 62 years at enrollment) with early breast cancer, post-5 years' adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. The objective of this evaluation was to extrapolate the findings from the MA17 trial to estimate the lifetime cost effectiveness of letrozole in this setting.
METHODS: A Markov model was used to estimate the incremental cost per QALY gained with extended adjuvant letrozole versus no therapy. Probabilities of disease progression and death were estimated using data from the MA17 study and other secondary sources. Costs of breast cancer care (letrozole therapy, surveillance, recurrences, terminal care) and treatment of osteoporosis and utilities were derived from literature. A full probabilistic sensitivity analysis was undertaken. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and cost estimates reflect 2004 values. All costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5%.
RESULTS: Extended adjuvant letrozole resulted in a gain of 0.36 QALYs per patient (13.66 vs 13.30 with no therapy). These benefits were obtained at an additional expected lifetime cost of 3732 pounds per patient (10,833 pounds letrozole vs 7101 pounds with no therapy). Cost effectiveness was estimated at 10,338 pounds per QALY gained (95% CI 5276, 43,828). The results were robust to sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION: Five years of letrozole therapy appears to be cost effective from the NHS perspective and should be considered in women with early breast cancer, following tamoxifen adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16519546     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200624030-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  14 in total

1.  Superior efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III study of the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group.

Authors:  H Mouridsen; M Gershanovich; Y Sun; R Pérez-Carrión; C Boni; A Monnier; J Apffelstaedt; R Smith; H P Sleeboom; F Jänicke; A Pluzanska; M Dank; D Becquart; P P Bapsy; E Salminen; R Snyder; M Lassus; J A Verbeek; B Staffler; H A Chaudri-Ross; M Dugan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Treatment of established osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; J E Brazier; M Stevenson; N W Calvert; M Lloyd Jones
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Tamoxifen plus chemotherapy versus tamoxifen alone as adjuvant therapies for node-positive postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: a stochastic economic evaluation.

Authors:  Jonathan Karnon; Jackie Brown
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide.

Authors:  F A Sonnenberg; J R Beck
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Locoregional first recurrence after mastectomy: prospective cohort studies with and without immediate chemotherapy.

Authors:  B J Haylock; C M Coppin; J Jackson; V E Basco; K S Wilson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Health-related quality of life in economic evaluations for osteoporosis: whose values should we use?

Authors:  S E Gabriel; T S Kneeland; L J Melton; M M Moncur; B Ettinger; A N Tosteson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Local-regional breast cancer recurrence: prognostic groups based on patterns of failure.

Authors:  Meena S Moran; Bruce G Haffty
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.431

9.  First isolated locoregional recurrence following mastectomy for breast cancer: results of a phase III multicenter study comparing systemic treatment with observation after excision and radiation. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research.

Authors:  M Borner; M Bacchi; A Goldhirsch; R Greiner; F Harder; M Castiglione; W F Jungi; B Thürlimann; F Cavalli; J P Obrecht
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The significance of local recurrence of carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  L M Toonkel; I Fix; L H Jacobson; C B Wallach
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Increasing protection after tamoxifen: insights from the extended adjuvant aromatase inhibitor trials.

Authors:  Carsten Rose
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Letrozole: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Christopher Dunn; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Methodological issues in evaluating cost effectiveness of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer: a need for improved modelling to aid decision making.

Authors:  Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Letrozole: a review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer from a Chinese perspective: doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide versus docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Peng Liubao; Wan Xiaomin; Tan Chongqing; Jon Karnon; Chen Gannong; Li Jianhe; Cui Wei; Luo Xia; Cao Junhua
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Continuing with letrozole offers greater benefits.

Authors:  Fritz Jänicke
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 4.322

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.