Literature DB >> 11896752

Local-regional breast cancer recurrence: prognostic groups based on patterns of failure.

Meena S Moran1, Bruce G Haffty.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of breast cancer patients sustaining local-regional failure as their first site of relapse in an effort to group patients into prognostic categories. Between January 1970 and December 1992, over 4,000 patients with breast cancer were treated at our facilities with mastectomy or conservative surgery with radiation therapy (CS + RT). Two hundred thirteen patients sustained local-regional relapse without evidence of distant metastasis as their first site of failure, and they served as the population base for this study. The 213 patients with local-regional recurrence of disease were distributed as follows: 68 patients relapsed in the ipsilateral breast following CS + RT within 5 years of original diagnosis (EARLYBR). Fifty-one patients relapsed in the ipsilateral breast after 5 years from original diagnosis (LATEBR). Thirty-five patients relapsed in the chest wall within 5 years following mastectomy (EARLCW). Eighteen patients relapsed in the chest wall later than 5 years following mastectomy, and 41 patients failed in the regional lymphatics following mastectomy or CS + RT (REGREC). Patients with breast relapses were generally treated with salvage mastectomy, and patients with chest wall or regional nodal relapses were treated with radiation to the chest wall, regional nodes, or both. Systemic therapy at the time of local-regional relapse was highly individualized, ranging from observation to tamoxifen to high-dose chemotherapy with transplantation. With a median follow-up of 14 years, the overall 10-year survival for all 213 patients was 61%, and the 10-year distant metastasis-free rate was 59%. Patients with a LATEBR had a relatively favorable prognosis with a 5-year postrelapse distant metastasis rate of 80%. Patients with EARLYBR and LATECW had a similar prognosis, with a 5-year postrelapse distant metastasis rate of 61% and 65%, respectively. Patients with an EARLCW had a 5-year distant recurrence-free rate following a local relapse of 42%. Ten-year survivals from original diagnosis were 62% and 50%, respectively, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 56% and 52%, respectively. Patients suffering REGREC following mastectomy or CS + RT carried a poor prognosis with a 10-year survival of 33% and a 10-year distant metastasis-free rate of 30%. Patients sustaining local-regional relapse as a first site of failure may be divided into prognostic groups. Patients with LATEBR have a relatively favorable prognosis. Patients with EARLYBR and CWREC have a poorer prognosis with a distant metastatic rate of approximately 50% within 5 years of local-regional relapse. Patients with REGREC have the poorest prognosis. Placing patients with breast cancer and local-regional relapse into these prognostic categories may be helpful in decision making regarding the role of systemic therapy at the time of local-regional relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11896752     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2002.08202.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  19 in total

1.  Solitary pancreatic lymph node metastasis from carcinoma of the breast: case report.

Authors:  Giacomo Corrado; Giorgia Garganese; Gilda Fuoco; Arnaldo Carbone; Giovanni Scambia; Gabriella Ferrandina
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 2.644

2.  Local relapse after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: effects on survival parameters.

Authors:  Josef Hammer; Christine Track; Dietmar H Seewald; Kurt J Spiegl; Johannes Feichtinger; Andreas L Petzer; Werner Langsteger; Sabine Pöstlberger; Elisabeth Bräutigam
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Cost effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal women after adjuvant tamoxifen therapy: the UK perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan Karnon; Thomas Delea; Stephen R D Johnston; Robert Smith; Jane Brandman; Jennifer Sung; Paul E Goss
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Functional maps of metastases from breast cancers: proof of the principle that multidimensional scaling can summarize disease progression.

Authors:  Lincoln C Gray; Jayant S Vaidya; Michael Baum; Rajendra A Badwe; Indraneel Mittra; Tariq Siddiqui; Dorothea Wiarda
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The impact of structural uncertainty on cost-effectiveness models for adjuvant endocrine breast cancer treatments: the need for disease-specific model standardization and improved guidance.

Authors:  Gerardus W J Frederix; Johan G C van Hasselt; Jan H M Schellens; Anke M Hövels; Jan A M Raaijmakers; Alwin D R Huitema; Johan L Severens
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer from a Chinese perspective: doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide versus docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Peng Liubao; Wan Xiaomin; Tan Chongqing; Jon Karnon; Chen Gannong; Li Jianhe; Cui Wei; Luo Xia; Cao Junhua
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Full-thickness chest wall resection for locally recurrent breast cancer.

Authors:  Godehard Friedel; Thomas Kuipers; Corinna Engel; Christine Schopf; Stefanie Veit; Jutta Zoller; Thomas Kyriss; Michael Greulich; Heikki Toomes
Journal:  Thorac Surg Sci       Date:  2005-08-22

8.  The impact of local and regional recurrence on distant metastasis and survival in patients treated with breast conservation therapy.

Authors:  Jong Seok Lee; Seung Il Kim; Hyung Seok Park; Jun Sang Lee; Seho Park; Byeong-Woo Park
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.588

9.  Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is an option for patients with localized breast recurrences after previous external-beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher; Lelia Bauer; Antonella Scheda; Carola Schoeber; Joerg Schaefer; Volker Steil; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Oncologic safety of skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy: a discussion and review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher Tokin; Anna Weiss; Jessica Wang-Rodriguez; Sarah L Blair
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.