Literature DB >> 16518144

Hearing-impaired children in the United Kingdom, I: Auditory performance, communication skills, educational achievements, quality of life, and cochlear implantation.

Paula C Stacey1, Heather M Fortnum, Garry R Barton, A Quentin Summerfield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to identify variables that are associated with differences in outcome among hearing-impaired children and to control those variables while assessing the impact of cochlear implantation. STUDY
DESIGN: In a cross-sectional study, the parents and teachers of a representative sample of hearing-impaired children were invited to complete questionnaires about children's auditory performance, spoken communication skills, educational achievements, and quality of life. Multiple regression was used to measure the strength of association between these outcomes and variables related to the child (average hearing level, age at onset of hearing impairment, age, gender, number of additional disabilities), the family (parental occupational skill level, ethnicity, and parental hearing status), and cochlear implantation.
RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by the parents of 2858 children, 468 of whom had received a cochlear implant, and by the teachers of 2241 children, 383 of whom had received an implant. Across all domains, reported outcomes were better for children with fewer disabilities in addition to impaired hearing. Across most domains, reported outcomes were better for children who were older, female, with a more favorable average hearing level, with a higher parental occupational skill level, and with an onset of hearing-impairment after 3 years. When these variables were controlled, cochlear implantation was consistently associated with advantages in auditory performance and spoken communication skills, but less consistently associated with advantages in educational achievements and quality of life. Significant associations were found most commonly for children who were younger than 5 years when implanted, and had used implants for more than 4 years. These children, whose mean (preoperative, unaided) average hearing level was 118 dB, were reported to perform at the same level as nonimplanted children with average hearing levels in the range from 80 dB to 104 dB, depending on the outcome measure.
CONCLUSIONS: When rigorous statistical control is exercised in comparing implanted and nonimplanted children, pediatric cochlear implantation is associated with reported improvements both in spoken communication skills and in some aspects of educational achievements and quality of life, provided that children receive implants before 5 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16518144     DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000202353.37567.b4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  19 in total

Review 1.  Public health and laboratory considerations regarding newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  Sheila C Dollard; Mark R Schleiss; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.982

2.  Will they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe to profound hearing loss.

Authors:  Johanna Grant Nicholas; Ann E Geers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Short-term results of Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implantation in prelingually deafened children.

Authors:  Ozgul Akin Senkal; Evren Hizal; Haluk Yavuz; Ismail Yilmaz; Levent Naci Ozluoglu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Health state preference scores for children with permanent childhood hearing loss: a comparative analysis of the QWB and HUI3.

Authors:  Laura Smith-Olinde; Scott D Grosse; Frank Olinde; Patti F Martin; John M Tilford
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Universal newborn screening for congenital CMV infection: what is the evidence of potential benefit?

Authors:  Michael J Cannon; Paul D Griffiths; Van Aston; William D Rawlinson
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 6.989

Review 6.  Quality of Life in Children with Hearing Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lauren Roland; Caroline Fischer; Kayla Tran; Tara Rachakonda; Dorina Kallogjeri; Judith E C Lieu
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Expected test scores for preschoolers with a cochlear implant who use spoken language.

Authors:  Johanna G Nicholas; Ann E Geers
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 8.  Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review.

Authors:  T Y C Ching; E van Wanrooy; H Dillon
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

9.  Neuropsychological correlates of vocabulary, reading, and working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mary K Fagan; David B Pisoni; David L Horn; Caitlin M Dillon
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2007-06-07

10.  Parent versus child assessment of quality of life in children using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Andrea D Warner-Czyz; Betty Loy; Peter S Roland; Liyue Tong; Emily A Tobey
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 1.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.