T A Chowdhury1, S S Lasker, R Mahfuz. 1. Barts and the London NHS Trust, Department of Diabetes and Metabolic Medicine, Mile End Diabetes Centre, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK. Tahseen.Chowdhury@bartsandthelondon.nhs.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: South Asians have higher risk of diabetic complications compared with white Europeans. The aim of this study was to compare management of cardiovascular risk factors between Bangladeshis and white Europeans. METHODS: A retrospective survey of all diabetic patients attending an Inner London hospital diabetic clinic over one year was undertaken. Data were obtained from the hospital diabetes database: presence of macrovascular (myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, cardiac intervention) and microvascular disease (neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy), glycated haemoglobin, blood pressure, lipids, smoking, and body mass index (BMI) were all determined. RESULTS: A total of 1162 white European and 912 Bangladeshi patients with full data available were included in the analyses. The groups were equivalent in age, sex, duration of diabetes. Compared with white Europeans, Bangladeshis had more macrovascular disease (19.5% v 11.9% p<0.01), sight threatening retinopathy (7.2% v 3.8%, p<0.01), and nephropathy (15.3% v 9.1%, p<0.01). In addition, Bangladeshis had significantly more male smokers (28.1% v 22.1%, p<0.01), poorer glycaemic control (mean HbA1c 8.6% v 8.1%, p = 0.039), greater proportion with uncontrolled hypercholesterolaemia (total cholesterol >5.0 mmol/l, 31.6% v 26% p = 0.05), and poorer control of blood pressure (proportion with BP >140/80 mm Hg, 43.2% v 32.1%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: South Asians with type 2 diabetes have poorer glycaemic, blood pressure, and lipid control than white Europeans. The reasons for this are probably multifactorial.
BACKGROUND: South Asians have higher risk of diabetic complications compared with white Europeans. The aim of this study was to compare management of cardiovascular risk factors between Bangladeshis and white Europeans. METHODS: A retrospective survey of all diabeticpatients attending an Inner London hospital diabetic clinic over one year was undertaken. Data were obtained from the hospital diabetes database: presence of macrovascular (myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, cardiac intervention) and microvascular disease (neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy), glycated haemoglobin, blood pressure, lipids, smoking, and body mass index (BMI) were all determined. RESULTS: A total of 1162 white European and 912 Bangladeshi patients with full data available were included in the analyses. The groups were equivalent in age, sex, duration of diabetes. Compared with white Europeans, Bangladeshis had more macrovascular disease (19.5% v 11.9% p<0.01), sight threatening retinopathy (7.2% v 3.8%, p<0.01), and nephropathy (15.3% v 9.1%, p<0.01). In addition, Bangladeshis had significantly more male smokers (28.1% v 22.1%, p<0.01), poorer glycaemic control (mean HbA1c 8.6% v 8.1%, p = 0.039), greater proportion with uncontrolled hypercholesterolaemia (total cholesterol >5.0 mmol/l, 31.6% v 26% p = 0.05), and poorer control of blood pressure (proportion with BP >140/80 mm Hg, 43.2% v 32.1%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: South Asians with type 2 diabetes have poorer glycaemic, blood pressure, and lipid control than white Europeans. The reasons for this are probably multifactorial.
Authors: R Bhopal; N Unwin; M White; J Yallop; L Walker; K G Alberti; J Harland; S Patel; N Ahmad; C Turner; B Watson; D Kaur; A Kulkarni; M Laker; A Tavridou Journal: BMJ Date: 1999-07-24
Authors: Navneet Aujla; Keith R Abrams; Melanie J Davies; Nick Taub; Timothy C Skinner; Kamlesh Khunti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bishwajit Bhowmik; Tasnima Siddiquee; Anindita Mujumder; Faria Afsana; Tareen Ahmed; Ibrahimu A Mdala; Nayla Cristina do V Moreira; Abul Kalam Azad Khan; Akhtar Hussain; Gerd Holmboe-Ottesen; Tone Kristin Omsland Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 3.390