Literature DB >> 16517775

Retrievability of the recovery vena cava filter after dwell times longer than 180 days.

Christoph A Binkert1, Kevin Sasadeusz, S William Stavropoulos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Permanent and optional (retrievable) inferior vena cava (IVC) filters reduce pulmonary embolism (PE) risk. Maximum safe dwell times for retrievable devices have not been defined. This retrospective multicenter analysis evaluated the feasibility of retrieval of the Bard Recovery filter after dwell times longer than 180 days.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients from three U.S. institutions were included. The patients ranged in age from 21 to 70 years (mean, 46.2 y); six were male, seven female. All filters were removed via the right internal jugular vein. Data were collected on filter position and condition, fluoroscopy time, complications, and IVC abnormality.
RESULTS: The filter dwell times ranged from 181 to 419 days (mean, 254.2+/-79.7 d). All filters were retrieved successfully without difficulties. The mean fluoroscopy time was 5.78+/-3.39 minutes (range, 3.12-16.0 min). Two of 13 filters had a tilt of more than 10 degrees , but no filter was embedded into the IVC wall. No filter migration or thrombus within the filter was observed. On 11 of 13 venograms, the arms projected outside the IVC in a parallel fashion, likely tenting the vessel. In one case, one leg and one arm pointed outside the IVC, likely penetrating the vessel. Venographic findings after retrieval were normal in all but one patient, who had a mild narrowing of the IVC (stenosis<30%).
CONCLUSION: Retrievals of the Recovery filter with dwell times beyond 180 days appear feasible and were performed without complication in this series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16517775     DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000195153.32491.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  7 in total

1.  Retrieval of Recovery IVC Filter After 1,463-Day Implantation.

Authors:  Michael S Stecker; Alisa Suzuki; Jonathan D Gates
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  Optional inferior vena caval filters: where are we now?

Authors:  A N Keeling; T B Kinney; M J Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Evidence-Based Evaluation of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Complications Based on Filter Type.

Authors:  Steven E Deso; Ibrahim A Idakoji; William T Kuo
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Prophylactic inferior vena cava filters in high-risk bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Khashayar Vaziri; J Devin Watson; Amy P Harper; Juliet Lee; Fredrick J Brody; Shawn Sarin; Elizabeth A Ignacio; Albert Chun; Anthony C Venbrux; Paul P Lin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Bedside placement of removable vena cava filters guided by intravascular ultrasound in the critically injured.

Authors:  Konstantinos Spaniolas; George C Velmahos; Christopher Kwolek; Alice Gervasini; Marc De Moya; Hasan B Alam
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Update on vena cava filters.

Authors:  Teresa L Carman; Alaa Alahmad
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-04

7.  Recurrent fracture of a recovery inferior vena cava filter with pulmonary migration.

Authors:  Josephina Anna Vossen; Shrey Kumar Thawait; Jennifer Susan Golia; Murthy Chamarthy; Walter Cholewczynski; Noel Velasco
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2012-06-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.