OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of studies of interventions designed to improve general medical care in persons with mental and addictive disorders. METHODS: Following Cochrane Collaboration guidelines, a comprehensive search through October 2005 was conducted in multiple bibliometric indexes using search terms related to primary medical care and mental health/addictive disorders. Two assessors independently extracted information on linkage, quality, outcomes and costs of care. RESULTS: Six randomized trials met the preestablished search criteria. The interventions spanned a continuum of approaches for improving treatment, ranging from on-site medical consultation, through team-based approaches, to models involving facilitated referrals to primary care. The studies demonstrated a substantial positive impact on linkage to and quality of medical care; there was evidence of health improvement and improved abstinence rates in patients with greater medical comorbidity. The three studies that assessed expenditures found the programs to be cost-neutral from a health-plan perspective. CONCLUSION: A small but growing body of research suggests that a range of models may hold potential for improving these patients' health and health care, at a relatively modest cost. Future work should continue to develop and test approaches to this problem that can be tailored to local system needs and capacities.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of studies of interventions designed to improve general medical care in persons with mental and addictive disorders. METHODS: Following Cochrane Collaboration guidelines, a comprehensive search through October 2005 was conducted in multiple bibliometric indexes using search terms related to primary medical care and mental health/addictive disorders. Two assessors independently extracted information on linkage, quality, outcomes and costs of care. RESULTS: Six randomized trials met the preestablished search criteria. The interventions spanned a continuum of approaches for improving treatment, ranging from on-site medical consultation, through team-based approaches, to models involving facilitated referrals to primary care. The studies demonstrated a substantial positive impact on linkage to and quality of medical care; there was evidence of health improvement and improved abstinence rates in patients with greater medical comorbidity. The three studies that assessed expenditures found the programs to be cost-neutral from a health-plan perspective. CONCLUSION: A small but growing body of research suggests that a range of models may hold potential for improving these patients' health and health care, at a relatively modest cost. Future work should continue to develop and test approaches to this problem that can be tailored to local system needs and capacities.
Authors: Michael T Abrams; Carol S Myers; Stephanie M Feldman; Cynthia Boddie-Willis; Junyong Park; Robert P McMahon; Deanna L Kelly Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Elizabeth Reisinger Walker; Frank W Berry; Tod Citron; Judy Fitzgerald; Mark H Rapaport; Bryan Stephens; Benjamin G Druss Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Christina Mangurian; Chelsea Modlin; Lindsey Williams; Susan Essock; Nicholas S Riano; Martha Shumway; John W Newcomer; James W Dilley; Dean Schillinger Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2017-11-28
Authors: Michael B Blank; Seth S Himelhoch; Alexandra B Balaji; David S Metzger; Lisa B Dixon; Charles E Rose; Emeka Oraka; Annet Davis-Vogel; William W Thompson; James D Heffelfinger Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mary Puckett; Julie Townsend; Jenny Rees Patterson; Donna Shaw; Yvonne Wasilewski; Sherri L Stewart Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Benjamin G Druss; Silke A von Esenwein; Michael T Compton; Kimberly J Rask; Liping Zhao; Ruth M Parker Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 18.112