Literature DB >> 16514327

A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled pilot trial of extended IV lidocaine infusion for relief of ongoing neuropathic pain.

Ivo W Tremont-Lukats1, Paul R Hutson, Misha-Miroslav Backonja.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the dose-response effect and safety of IV lidocaine at different dose infusion rates on spontaneous ongoing neuropathic pain.
METHODS: In this double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel study conducted in an outpatient clinical research center, patients with peripheral neuropathic pain received a 6-hour infusion of three doses (1, 3, and 5 mg/kg) of lidocaine or placebo. The main outcome measure was relief of pain intensity (percentage pain intensity difference [PID %]). Other measures were responder rate, adverse events, and correlation between lidocaine levels and PID %.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the median PID % between the group treated with lidocaine 5 mg/kg/h (-34.60) and the placebo group (-11.96, P=0.012). Such effect began 4 hours after the onset of treatment and lasted until the end of the study. Lidocaine at lower infusion rates was no better than placebo in relieving pain. A modest but significant correlation was found between methylethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) levels and pain relief (R=0.60). There were no serious adverse events, but in two patients lidocaine was stopped prematurely.
CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine at 5 mg/kg/h was more effective than placebo at relieving neuropathic pain. The effect started 4 hours after the onset of treatment and continued for at least 4 hours after the end of the infusion. Additional research is needed using higher infusion rates with larger sample sizes to confirm these results and to explore the role of MEGX in the relief of neuropathic pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16514327     DOI: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000169673.57062.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  25 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based guideline for neuropathic pain interventional treatments: spinal cord stimulation, intravenous infusions, epidural injections and nerve blocks.

Authors:  Angela Mailis; Paul Taenzer
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 2.  Anesthesia and fast-track in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS): from evidence to practice.

Authors:  Marzia Umari; Stefano Falini; Matteo Segat; Michele Zuliani; Marco Crisman; Lucia Comuzzi; Francesco Pagos; Stefano Lovadina; Umberto Lucangelo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Sodium channel blockers for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Anindya Bhattacharya; Alan D Wickenden; Sandra R Chaplan
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Treatment of Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Matthew T Mendlik; Tanya J Uritsky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 5.  Mechanisms of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  James N Campbell; Richard A Meyer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Evaluation of a constant rate infusion of lidocaine for balanced anesthesia in dogs undergoing surgery.

Authors:  Maria Ortega; Ignacio Cruz
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.008

7.  Inhibition of acid sensing ion channel currents by lidocaine in cultured mouse cortical neurons.

Authors:  Jun Lin; Xiangping Chu; Samaneh Maysami; Minghua Li; Hongfang Si; James E Cottrell; Roger P Simon; Zhigang Xiong
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 8.  Current Strategies for the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.

Authors:  Michael D Staudt; Tarun Prabhala; Breanna L Sheldon; Nicholas Quaranta; Michael Zakher; Ravneet Bhullar; Julie G Pilitsis; Charles E Argoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-28

9.  Supraspinal modulation of neuronal synchronization by nociceptive stimulation induces an enduring reorganization of dorsal horn neuronal connectivity.

Authors:  E Contreras-Hernández; D Chávez; E Hernández; E Velázquez; P Reyes; J Béjar; M Martín; U Cortés; S Glusman; P Rudomin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Phase 1A safety assessment of intravenous amitriptyline.

Authors:  Peter Fridrich; Hans Peter Colvin; Anthony Zizza; Ajay D Wasan; Jean Lukanich; Philipp Lirk; Alois Saria; Gerald Zernig; Thomas Hamp; Peter Gerner
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 5.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.