Literature DB >> 16513686

Accuracy and self correction of information received from an internet breast cancer list: content analysis.

Adol Esquivel1, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Elmer V Bernstam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of false or misleading statements in messages posted by internet cancer support groups and whether these statements were identified as false or misleading and corrected by other participants in subsequent postings.
DESIGN: Analysis of content of postings.
SETTING: Internet cancer support group Breast Cancer Mailing List. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of false or misleading statements posted from 1 January to 23 April 2005 and whether these were identified and corrected by participants in subsequent postings.
RESULTS: 10 of 4600 postings (0.22%) were found to be false or misleading. Of these, seven were identified as false or misleading by other participants and corrected within an average of four hours and 33 minutes (maximum, nine hours and nine minutes).
CONCLUSIONS: Most posted information on breast cancer was accurate. Most false or misleading statements were rapidly corrected by participants in subsequent postings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16513686      PMCID: PMC1444809          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38753.524201.7C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  11 in total

1.  Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web.

Authors:  S L Price; W R Hersh
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Evaluation of cancer information on the Internet.

Authors:  J S Biermann; G J Golladay; M L Greenfield; L H Baker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Medical information on the Internet: a study of an electronic bulletin board.

Authors:  J D Culver; F Gerr; H Frumkin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Information exchange in an epilepsy forum on the World Wide Web.

Authors:  D B Hoch; D Norris; J E Lester; A D Marcus
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 5.  The online patient meeting.

Authors:  A L Feenberg; J M Licht; K P Kane; K Moran; R A Smith
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.181

6.  Online help: cancer patients participate in a computer-mediated support group.

Authors:  N Weinberg; J Schmale; J Uken; K Wessel
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  1996-02

7.  Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey.

Authors:  D M Eisenberg; R C Kessler; M I Van Rompay; T J Kaptchuk; S A Wilkey; S Appel; R B Davis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Internet-based interaction among brain tumour patients. Analysis of a medical mailing list.

Authors:  K Mursch; J Behnke-Mursch
Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir       Date:  2003

9.  Information gathering over time by breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Melisa J Satterlund; Kevin D McCaul; Ann K Sandgren
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Evaluation of support groups for women with breast cancer: importance of the navigator role.

Authors:  James E Till
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  50 in total

1.  The challenges in making electronic health records accessible to patients.

Authors:  Leslie Beard; Rebecca Schein; Dante Morra; Kumanan Wilson; Jennifer Keelan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  GetHealthyHarlem.org: developing a web platform for health promotion and wellness driven by and for the Harlem community.

Authors:  Sharib A Khan; Jessica S Ancker; Jianhua Li; David Kaufman; Carly Hutchinson; Alwyn Cohall; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

3.  Are virtual communities good for our health?

Authors:  Alejandro R Jadad; Murray W Enkin; Sholom Glouberman; Philip Groff; Anita Stern
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-22

4.  Policing of information from internet breast cancer list: "list mining" raises new issues in research ethics.

Authors:  James E Till
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-06

5.  Policing of information from internet breast cancer list: findings may not be generally applicable.

Authors:  Ketan K Dhatariya
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-06

6.  Developing informatics tools and strategies for consumer-centered health communication.

Authors:  Alla Keselman; Robert Logan; Catherine Arnott Smith; Gondy Leroy; Qing Zeng-Treitler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: harnessing the power of information technology.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Aanand Dinkar Naik; Raghuram Rao; Laura Ann Petersen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Dealing with internet-based information obtained by families of critically ill patients.

Authors:  Yên-Lan Nguyen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Peer-to-peer communication, cancer prevention, and the internet.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Kristen M Carpenter; Paul Greene; Randi Hoffman; Rita Kukafka; Laura A V Marlow; Holly G Prigerson; John M Quillin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009

10.  Social support in an Internet weight loss community.

Authors:  Kevin O Hwang; Allison J Ottenbacher; Angela P Green; M Roseann Cannon-Diehl; Oneka Richardson; Elmer V Bernstam; Eric J Thomas
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 4.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.