Literature DB >> 16512551

Monte Carlo-based inverse model for calculating tissue optical properties. Part II: Application to breast cancer diagnosis.

Gregory M Palmer1, Changfang Zhu, Tara M Breslin, Fushen Xu, Kennedy W Gilchrist, Nirmala Ramanujam.   

Abstract

The Monte Carlo-based inverse model of diffuse reflectance described in part I of this pair of companion papers was applied to the diffuse reflectance spectra of a set of 17 malignant and 24 normal-benign ex vivo human breast tissue samples. This model allows extraction of physically meaningful tissue parameters, which include the concentration of absorbers and the size and density of scatterers present in tissue. It was assumed that intrinsic absorption could be attributed to oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin and beta-carotene, that scattering could be modeled by spheres of a uniform size distribution, and that the refractive indices of the spheres and the surrounding medium are known. The tissue diffuse reflectance spectra were evaluated over a wavelength range of 400-600 nm. The extracted parameters that showed the statistically most significant differences between malignant and nonmalignant breast tissues were hemoglobin saturation and the mean reduced scattering coefficient. Malignant tissues showed decreased hemoglobin saturation and an increased mean reduced scattering coefficient compared with nonmalignant tissues. A support vector machine classification algorithm was then used to classify a sample as malignant or nonmalignant based on these two extracted parameters and produced a cross-validated sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 92%, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16512551     DOI: 10.1364/ao.45.001072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Opt        ISSN: 1559-128X            Impact factor:   1.980


  41 in total

1.  Limitations of the commonly used simplified laterally uniform optical fiber probe-tissue interface in Monte Carlo simulations of diffuse reflectance.

Authors:  Peter Naglič; Franjo Pernuš; Boštjan Likar; Miran Bürmen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Portable, Fiber-Based, Diffuse Reflection Spectroscopy (DRS) Systems for Estimating Tissue Optical Properties.

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanath; Kevin Chang; Daniel Klein; Yu Feng Deng; Vivide Chang; Janelle E Phelps; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  A robust Monte Carlo model for the extraction of biological absorption and scattering in vivo.

Authors:  Janelle E Bender; Karthik Vishwanath; Laura K Moore; J Quincy Brown; Vivide Chang; Gregory M Palmer; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Quantitative physiology of the precancerous cervix in vivo through optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Vivide Tuan-Chyan Chang; Peter S Cartwright; Sarah M Bean; Greg M Palmer; Rex C Bentley; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.715

5.  Forecasting new development of tumor areas using spatial and temporal distribution profiles of hemoglobin saturation in a mouse model.

Authors:  Miguel R Ossandon; Dhananjay S Phatak; Brian S Sorg; Konstantinos Kalpakis
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-06-20

6.  Monte-Carlo-based model for the extraction of intrinsic fluorescence from turbid media.

Authors:  Gregory M Palmer; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Instrument independent diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Bing Yu; Henry L Fu; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 8.  Application of optical imaging and spectroscopy to radiation biology.

Authors:  Gregory M Palmer; Karthik Vishwanath; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Quantitative optical spectroscopy: a robust tool for direct measurement of breast cancer vascular oxygenation and total hemoglobin content in vivo.

Authors:  J Quincy Brown; Lee G Wilke; Joseph Geradts; Stephanie A Kennedy; Gregory M Palmer; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Scatter spectroscopic imaging distinguishes between breast pathologies in tissues relevant to surgical margin assessment.

Authors:  Ashley M Laughney; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Elizabeth J Rizzo; Mary C Schwab; Richard J Barth; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Wendy A Wells
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.