Literature DB >> 16510968

Ultrasonic characterization of human trabecular bone microstructure.

Mikko A Hakulinen1, Judd S Day, Juha Töyräs, Harrie Weinans, Jukka S Jurvelin.   

Abstract

New quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques involving ultrasound backscattering have been introduced for the assessment of bone quality. QUS parameters are affected by the transducer characteristics, e.g. frequency range, wave and pulse length. Although frequency-dependent backscattering has been studied extensively, understanding of the ultrasound scattering phenomenon in trabecular bone is still limited. In the present study, the relationships between QUS parameters and the microstructure of human trabecular bone were investigated experimentally and by using numerical simulations. Speed of sound (SOS), normalized broadband ultrasound attenuation (nBUA), average attenuation, integrated reflection coefficient (IRC) and broadband ultrasound backscatter (BUB) were measured for 26 human trabecular bone cylinders. Subsequently, a high-resolution microCT system was used to determine the microstructural parameters. Moreover, based on the sample-specific microCT data, a numerical model for ultrasound propagation was developed for the simulation of experimental measurements. Experimentally, significant relationships between the QUS parameters and microstructural parameters were demonstrated. The relationships were dependent on the frequency, and the strongest association (r = 0.88) between SOS and structural parameters was observed at a centre frequency of 5 MHz. nBUA, average attenuation, IRC and BUB showed somewhat lower linear correlations with the structural properties at a centre frequency of 5 MHz, as compared to those determined at lower frequencies. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the variation of acoustic parameters could best be explained by parameters reflecting the amount of mineralized tissue. A principal component analysis demonstrated that the strongest determinants of BUB and IRC were related to the trabecular structure. However, other structural characteristics contributed significantly to the prediction of the acoustic parameters as well. The two-dimensional numerical model introduced in the present study demonstrated good agreement with the experimental measurements. However, further studies with the simulation model are warranted to systematically investigate the relation between the structural parameters and ultrasound scattering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16510968     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/6/019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  18 in total

1.  Relationships of quantitative ultrasound parameters with cancellous bone microstructure in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Srinidhi Nagaraja; Maureen L Dreher; Sheng L Gibson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of intervening tissues on ultrasonic backscatter measurements of bone: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; P Luke Spinolo; Mark E Sellers; Peyton L Marshall; Ann M Viano; Sang-Rok Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Structural parameters of normal and osteoporotic human trabecular bone are affected differently by microCT image resolution.

Authors:  H Isaksson; J Töyräs; M Hakulinen; A S Aula; I Tamminen; P Julkunen; H Kröger; J S Jurvelin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Ultrasonic backscatter difference measurements of cancellous bone from the human femur: Relation to bone mineral density and microstructure.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; Ann M Viano; Jinsong Huang; Luke C Fairbanks; Sheldon C Ebron; Joshua T Moore; Jordan P Ankersen; Matthew T Huber; Abel A Diaz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A backscatter difference technique for ultrasonic bone assessment.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; Anne R Wilson; Matthew J Gilbert; Mark E Sellers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Relationships among ultrasonic and mechanical properties of cancellous bone in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Srinidhi Nagaraja; Maureen L Dreher; Saghi Sadoughi; Shan Zhu; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Ultrasound to assess bone quality.

Authors:  Kay Raum; Quentin Grimal; Peter Varga; Reinhard Barkmann; Claus C Glüer; Pascal Laugier
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Characterization of a polymer, open-cell rigid foam that simulates the ultrasonic properties of cancellous bone.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; Matthew T Huber; Ann M Viano; Jinsong Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  A comparison of principal component analysis and factor analysis strategies for uncovering pleiotropic factors.

Authors:  Xiaojing Wang; Candace M Kammerer; Stewart Anderson; Jiang Lu; Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.