Literature DB >> 16510823

Revision of failed acetabular components with use of so-called jumbo noncemented components. A concise follow-up of a previous report.

Kelly J Hendricks1, William H Harris.   

Abstract

Acetabular revision in the presence of major bone-stock deficiency is a difficult clinical and surgical problem. Of an original pool of twenty-four consecutive patients treated with an acetabular revision with a so-called jumbo (>65-mm) cementless hemispherical acetabular component, fifteen were followed for an average of seven years in our previous study. The current report presents the results for the twelve patients in this group who were alive at a minimum of twelve years (mean, 13.9 years) postoperatively and agreed to return for follow-up. The average final Harris hip score was 79 points. No acetabular shell had been revised because of aseptic loosening, and none was loose as seen radiographically. The complication rate was high but was largely related to infection. In the patients without infection, the fixation of these large sockets remained excellent at the time of long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16510823     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

1.  Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components.

Authors:  E Scott Paxton; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.

Authors:  Xavier Flecher; Benjamin Appy; Sébastien Parratte; Matthieu Ollivier; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup.

Authors:  Nienke van Egmond; Daniel C J De Kam; Jean W M Gardeniers; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Acetabular revisions using porous tantalum components: A retrospective study with 5-10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Francesco Roberto Evola; Luciano Costarella; Giuseppe Evola; Martina Barchitta; Antonella Agodi; Giuseppe Sessa
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 5.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of jumbo cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Qiuyuan Wang; Qi Wang; Pei Liu; Juncheng Ge; Qidong Zhang; Wanshou Guo; Weiguo Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-10-04

6.  [Acetabular reconstruction in total hip replacement].

Authors:  Hassane Zejjari; Jamal Louaste; Taoufik Cherrad; Hicham Bousbae; Housseine Kasmaoui; Larbi Amhajji; Khalid Rachid
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-11-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.