Literature DB >> 16510819

Effect of medical comorbidity on self-assessed pain, function, and general health status after rotator cuff repair.

Robert Z Tashjian1, R Frank Henn, Lana Kang, Andrew Green.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a previous study, we found that medical comorbidities have a negative effect on preoperative pain, function, and general health status in patients with a chronic rotator cuff tear. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between medical comorbidities and the postoperative outcome of rotator cuff repair.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five patients were evaluated on the basis of a history (including medical comorbidities) and use of outcome tools preoperatively and at one year after rotator cuff repair. Outcome was evaluated with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), visual analog scales (pain, function, and quality of life), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36).
RESULTS: The mean number of medical comorbidities was 1.91 (range, zero to six). At one year after rotator cuff repair, there were no significant correlations between comorbidities and pain, shoulder function, or quality of life as determined with the SST, DASH, and visual analog scales (p > 0.05). A greater number of comorbidities was associated with a worse postoperative general health status (SF-36 role emotional [p = 0.045], SF-36 bodily pain [p = 0.032], SF-36 general health [p = 0.001], and SF-36 vitality [p = 0.033]). Nevertheless, a greater number of comorbidities was associated with greater improvement, compared with the preoperative status, in the pain score on the visual analog scale (p = 0.009), function as assessed with the visual analog scale (p = 0.022) and the DASH (p = 0.044), and quality of life as assessed with the visual analog scale (p = 0.041).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more medical comorbidities have a worse general health status after rotator cuff repair. Interestingly, it also appears that these patients have greater improvement in overall shoulder pain, function, and quality-of-life scores compared with preoperative scores. Therefore, despite a negative effect of comorbidities on outcomes, patients with more comorbidities have greater improvement after the repair, to the point where postoperative shoulder function and pain are not significantly influenced by medical comorbidities. Consequently, a higher number of medical comorbidities should not be considered a negative factor in determining whether a patient should undergo rotator cuff repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16510819     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  19 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic factors influencing the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Gianpiero Cazzato; Fabrizio Donati; Pietro Randelli; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Tenodesis is not superior to tenotomy in the treatment of the long head of biceps tendon lesions.

Authors:  Roberto Castricini; Filippo Familiari; Marco De Gori; Daria Anna Riccelli; Massimo De Benedetto; Nicola Orlando; Olimpio Galasso; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Comparative Effectiveness of Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity Score Analysis From the ROW Cohort.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; Gregory D Ayers; Run Fan; John E Kuhn; Jon J P Warner; Keith M Baumgarten; Elizabeth Matzkin; Laurence D Higgins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Psychologic distress reduces preoperative self-assessment scores in femoroacetabular impingement patients.

Authors:  Michael Q Potter; James D Wylie; Grant S Sun; James T Beckmann; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Do outcomes differ after rotator cuff repair for patients receiving workers' compensation?

Authors:  R Balyk; C Luciak-Corea; D Otto; D Baysal; L Beaupre
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Psychological distress negatively affects self-assessment of shoulder function in patients with rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Michael Q Potter; James D Wylie; Patrick E Greis; Robert T Burks; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Shoulder activity level in the preoperative assessment of patients with rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Sigitas Ryliskis; Robert H Brophy; Manvilius Kocius; Robert G Marx
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Are Psychosocial Factors Associated With Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Amee L Seitz; Erica Pelote; Kristin R Archer; Nitin B Jain
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Predictors of pain and functional outcomes after operative treatment for rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; Gregory D Ayers; Run Fan; John E Kuhn; Keith M Baumgarten; Elizabeth Matzkin; Laurence D Higgins
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  An Evaluation of the Rotator Cuff Repair Research Pipeline.

Authors:  Jake X Checketts; Jared Scott; Josh Gordon; Jaclyn Jones; Jarryd Horn; Michelle Farabough; Jake Whitener; Marshall Boose; Matt Vassar
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.