Literature DB >> 16509941

The quest for the perfect baby: why do Israeli women seek prenatal genetic testing?

Larissa Remennick1.   

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s, the Israeli medical scene has witnessed a real boom in elective prenatal testing for inherited diseases that has spread beyond risk groups to the general Jewish population, especially of Ashkenazi (European) origin. This study tried to identify key social influences involved in the growing range and prevalence of prenatal genetic tests as they emerged from women's own perspective. Twenty-seven women having blood tests for genetic mutations were interviewed at two types of genetic clinics, and re-interviewed after getting test results. The names of 23 women who chose not to have elective tests were obtained from testers, and these non-testers were interviewed for comparison. Women's accounts suggest that elective genetic testing is more acceptable, if not normative, among educated middle class Ashkenazi women, and is more often questioned and refused by lower class Mizrahi women, as well as religious women of any ethnic origin. The key forces that drive women's choice of prenatal genetic diagnosis include the fear of having a sick and/or socially unfit child in an unsupportive environment; strong endorsement of testing by gynaecologists; popular and professional discourse on the common Ashkenazi mutations causing genetic anxiety in this ethnic group (i.e. apprehension of multiple known and unknown dangers hidden in its genetic makeup); and the emerging social pressure for comprehensive prenatal screening as an indispensable part of good motherhood. Many women described the experience of testing as frustrating because of the long wait for results and difficulty of their interpretation and subsequent decision-making. Women who rejected elective tests explained their decision by moral/religious objections to abortion and/or eugenic aspects of prenatal screening, as well as by prohibitive costs and poor understanding of the tests' meaning and implications. Yet, few informants voiced objections to the excessive medicalisation of pregnancy as such; ethno-national motives of reproductive decisions were also uncommon in this group. More critical reflection is clearly needed from both providers and users of elective genetic screening before the more widespread uptake of this practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16509941     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00481.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  21 in total

1.  Prenatal whole genome sequencing: just because we can, should we?

Authors:  Greer Donley; Sara Chandros Hull; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Correlates of genetic counseling and testing among Orthodox Jews.

Authors:  Shulamis Juni Pollak
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2009-08-11

3.  Socializing the public: invoking Hannah Arendt's critique of modernity to evaluate reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Daniel Sperling
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2012-02

4.  A Qualitative Look into Israeli Genetic Experts' Insights Regarding Culturally Competent Genetic Counseling and Recommendations for Its Enhancement.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  The decision-making process, experience, and perceptions of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) users.

Authors:  Shachar Zuckerman; Sigal Gooldin; David A Zeevi; Gheona Altarescu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Factors that affect the decision to undergo amniocentesis in women with normal Down syndrome screening results: it is all about the age.

Authors:  Julia Grinshpun-Cohen; Talya Miron-Shatz; Liat Ries-Levavi; Elon Pras
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Expectant Israeli fathers and the medicalized pregnancy: ambivalent compliance and critical pragmatism.

Authors:  Tsipy Ivry; Elly Teman
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2008-09

8.  Genetic testing of children for familial cancers: a comparative legal perspective on consent, communication of information and confidentiality.

Authors:  Roy Gilbar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Acceptable applications of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) among Israeli PGD users.

Authors:  Shachar Zuckerman; David A Zeevi; Sigal Gooldin; Gheona Altarescu
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Diversity and uniformity in genetic responsibility: moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people in Germany and Israel.

Authors:  Aviad E Raz; Silke Schicktanz
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2009-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.