Literature DB >> 16509299

Biosolids--a fuel or a waste? An integrated appraisal of five co-combustion scenarios with policy analysis.

Elise Cartmell1, Peter Gostelow, Drusilla Riddell-Black, Nigel Simms, John Oakey, Joe Morris, Paul Jeffrey, Peter Howsam, Simon J Pollard.   

Abstract

An integrated appraisal of five technology scenarios for the co-combustion of biosolids in the UK energy and waste management policy context is presented. Co-combustion scenarios with coal, municipal solid waste, wood, and for cement manufacture were subject to thermodynamic and materials flow modeling and evaluated by 19 stakeholder representatives. All scenarios provided a net energy gain (0.58-5.0 kWh/kg dry solids), having accounted for the energy required for transportation and sludge drying. Co-combustion within the power generation and industrial (e.g., cement) sectors is most readily implemented but provides poor water utility control, and it suffers from poor public perception. Co-combustion with wastes or biomass appears more sustainable but requires greater investment and presents significant risks to water utilities. Incongruities within current energy and waste management policy are discussed and conclusions for improved understanding are drawn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16509299     DOI: 10.1021/es052181g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

Review 1.  Utilization of urban sewage sludge: Chinese perspectives.

Authors:  H Chen; S-H Yan; Z-L Ye; H-J Meng; Y-G Zhu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Technological options for the management of biosolids.

Authors:  Hailong Wang; Sally L Brown; Guna N Magesan; Alison H Slade; Michael Quintern; Peter W Clinton; Tim W Payn
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Biosolids management strategies: an evaluation of energy production as an alternative to land application.

Authors:  Maureen Egan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Pyrolyzed municipal sewage sludge ensured safe grain production while reduced C emissions in a paddy soil under rice and wheat rotation.

Authors:  Qianqian Shao; Yanyan Ju; Wenjie Guo; Xin Xia; Rongjun Bian; Lianqing Li; Wenjian Li; Xiaoyu Liu; Jufeng Zheng; Genxing Pan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.