Literature DB >> 16507002

Psychiatric endophenotypes and the development of valid animal models.

T D Gould1, I I Gottesman.   

Abstract

Endophenotypes are quantifiable components in the genes-to-behaviors pathways, distinct from psychiatric symptoms, which make genetic and biological studies of etiologies for disease categories more manageable. The endophenotype concept has emerged as a strategic tool in neuropsychiatric research. This emergence is due to many factors, including the modest reproducibility of results from studies directed toward etiologies and appreciation for the complex relationships between genes and behavior. Disease heterogeneity is often guaranteed, rather than simplified, through the current diagnostic system; inherent benefits of endophenotypes include more specific disease concepts and process definitions. Endophenotypes can be neurophysiological, biochemical, endocrine, neuroanatomical, cognitive or neuropsychological. Heritability and stability (state independence) represent key components of any useful endophenotype. Importantly, they characterize an approach that reduces the complexity of symptoms and multifaceted behaviors, resulting in units of analysis that are more amenable to being modeled in animals. We discuss the benefits of more direct interpretation of clinical endophenotypes by basic behavioral scientists. With the advent of important findings regarding the genes that predispose to psychiatric illness, we are at an important crossroads where, without anthropomorphizing, animal models may provide homologous components of psychiatric illness, rather than simply equating to similar (loosely analogized) behaviors, validators of the efficacy of current medications or models of symptoms. We conclude that there exists a need for increased collaboration between clinicians and basic scientists, the result of which should be to improve diagnosis, classification and treatment on one end and to increase the construct relevance of model organisms on the other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16507002     DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00186.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Brain Behav        ISSN: 1601-183X            Impact factor:   3.449


  159 in total

Review 1.  Genetic models of sensorimotor gating: relevance to neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Susan B Powell; Martin Weber; Mark A Geyer
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Mistreating Psychology in the Decades of the Brain.

Authors:  Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-11

3.  Quantitative trait locus and haplotype mapping in closely related inbred strains identifies a locus for open field behavior.

Authors:  Amy F Eisener-Dorman; Laura Grabowski-Boase; Brian M Steffy; Tim Wiltshire; Lisa M Tarantino
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Antisaccade performance in schizophrenia patients, their first-degree biological relatives, and community comparison subjects: data from the COGS study.

Authors:  Allen D Radant; Dorcas J Dobie; Monica E Calkins; Ann Olincy; David L Braff; Kristin S Cadenhead; Robert Freedman; Michael F Green; Tiffany A Greenwood; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Gregory A Light; Sean P Meichle; Steve P Millard; Jim Mintz; Keith H Nuechterlein; Nicholas J Schork; Larry J Seidman; Larry J Siever; Jeremy M Silverman; William S Stone; Neal R Swerdlow; Ming T Tsuang; Bruce I Turetsky; Debby W Tsuang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Functional connectivity between cognitive control regions is sensitive to familial risk for ADHD.

Authors:  Martijn J Mulder; Janna van Belle; Herman van Engeland; Sarah Durston
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  The importance of considering all attributes of memory in behavioral endophenotyping of mouse models of genetic disease.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 7.  Best behaviour? Ontologies and the formal description of animal behaviour.

Authors:  Georgios V Gkoutos; Robert Hoehndorf; Loukia Tsaprouni; Paul N Schofield
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 8.  Clashing Diagnostic Approaches: DSM-ICD Versus RDoC.

Authors:  Scott O Lilienfeld; Michael T Treadway
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 18.561

9.  Examining Procedural Learning and Corticostriatal Pathways for Individual Differences in Language: Testing Endophenotypes of DRD2/ANKK1.

Authors:  Joanna C Lee; Kathryn L Mueller; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Temporal stability of posterior EEG alpha over twelve years.

Authors:  Craig E Tenke; Jürgen Kayser; Jorge E Alvarenga; Karen S Abraham; Virginia Warner; Ardesheer Talati; Myrna M Weissman; Gerard E Bruder
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.