Literature DB >> 16506463

Prospective randomized controlled study of the Bryan Cervical Disc: early clinical results from a single investigational site.

Domagoj Coric1, Frederick Finger, Peggy Boltes.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors report on a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial in which they compared the clinical outcomes obtained in patients who underwent the placement of a Bryan Cervical Disc System with those obtained in patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). In the present study, they evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the artificial disc based on data obtained at a single investigational site.
METHODS: Patients with primary, single-level cervical disc disease producing radiculopathy and/or myelopathy were randomized prospectively to undergo anterior cervical discectomy with either fusion or artificial disc placement. The patients were evaluated with pre- and postoperative serial radiographic studies; the authors also evaluated neck disability indices, visual analog scale scores for pain, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey scores, and neurological status at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Analysis of the early results obtained in the 33 patients indicated an absence of device-related complications. Preliminary analysis revealed that improvement in all clinical outcome measures was excellent for both treatment groups; however, in patients treated with the artificial cervical disc, motion at the treated level was maintained.
CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results documented at this investigational site are encouraging. Evaluation of data acquired in the Bryan disc treatment group showed that improvements in the clinical parameters were similar to those in the fusion group. Additionally in the artificial disc-treated group, there was radiographic evidence that motion was maintained. It is theorized that motion preservation may potentially reduce the rate of adjacent-level cervical disc disease that has been documented in patients who undergo ACDF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16506463     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2006.4.1.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  23 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Jae Hyuk Shin; Jose Joefrey Arbatin; Moon Soo Park; Yung Khee Chung; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael A Finn; Darrel S Brodke; Michael Daubs; Alpesh Patel; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Geographic variation in the surgical treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease: American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Quality Improvement Initiative; part II candidates.

Authors:  Kevin J McGuire; John Harrast; Harry Herkowitz; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ahmad Faizan; Vivek Palepu; Sanghita Bhattacharya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  WITHDRAWN: Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Toon F M Boselie; Paul C Willems; Henk van Mameren; Rob de Bie; Edward C Benzel; Henk van Santbrink
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-21

Review 7.  The role of stem cell therapies in degenerative lumbar spine disease: a review.

Authors:  David Oehme; Tony Goldschlager; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Peter Ghosh; Graham Jenkin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Cervical radiculopathy: is a prosthesis preferred over fusion surgery? A systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline M W Goedmakers; Tessa Janssen; Xiaoyu Yang; Mark P Arts; Ronald H M A Bartels; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The NEtherlands Cervical Kinematics (NECK) trial. Cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy with or without interbody fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation; a double-blind randomised multicenter study.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Ronald Brand; Elske van den Akker; Bart W Koes; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy surgical trial: randomized, controlled trial design and rationale.

Authors:  Zoher Ghogawala; Edward C Benzel; Robert F Heary; K Daniel Riew; Todd J Albert; William E Butler; Fred G Barker; John G Heller; Paul C McCormick; Robert G Whitmore; Karen M Freund; J Sanford Schwartz
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.