Literature DB >> 16505661

Four methods of measuring tidal volume during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.

David N Hager1, Mathew Fuld, David W Kaczka, Henry E Fessler, Roy G Brower, Brett A Simon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Assess the accuracy of four different methods of measuring tidal volume during simulated high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.
DESIGN: In vitro study.
SETTING: Research laboratory.
SUBJECTS: Three differential pressure pneumotachometers, a modified Pitot tube, an ultrasound flowmeter, and an adult hot wire anemometer.
INTERVENTIONS: Each device was placed in series with a Sensormedics 3100B high-frequency ventilator and an 8.0-mm endotracheal tube attached to a 48.9-L plethysmograph. Inspiratory/expiratory ratio was fixed at 1:1 and mean airway pressure at 10 cm H2O. Tidal volumes were calculated at each combination of frequency (f: 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 Hz) and pressure amplitude (DeltaP: 30, 60, 90 cm H2O) by digital integration of the sampled flow signals from each device and compared with those calculated from pressure changes within the plethysmograph. The protocol was repeated after incorporation of frequency-specific calibrations to the flow-measuring algorithm of each device. The hot wire anemometer was further evaluated at Fio2 of 1.0, 37 degrees C, 80% humidity, mean airway pressure of 20 cm H2O, and an inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1:2.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Tidal volumes were 36-305 mL. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that each device exhibited systematic bias before frequency-specific adjustment. After frequency-specific adjustment of the flow-measuring algorithm, the two most accurate and precise devices were the Hans Rudolph pneumotachometer, which exhibited a mean error of 0.2% (95% confidence interval, -3.0% to 3.4%), and the hot wire anemometer, which had a mean error of -1.1% (95% confidence interval, -5.5% to 3.3%). The hot wire anemometer remained accurate at Fio2 1.0, 37 degrees C, 80% humidity, mean airway pressure of 20 cm H2O, and an inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1:2.
CONCLUSIONS: Tidal volume can be measured during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation using a variety of techniques. Frequency-specific calibration improves the accuracy and precision of tidal volume measurements. Hot wire anemometry exhibits stable performance characteristics across the range of temperature, humidity, Fio2, and inspiratory/expiratory ratios encountered clinically, has a small deadspace, is unaffected by mean airway pressure, and is therefore suitable for clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16505661     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201400.63304.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  5 in total

Review 1.  Oscillation mechanics of the respiratory system: applications to lung disease.

Authors:  David W Kaczka; Raffaele L Dellacá
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2011

2.  Systems for lung volume standardization during static and dynamic MDCT-based quantitative assessment of pulmonary structure and function.

Authors:  Matthew K Fuld; Randall W Grout; Junfeng Guo; John H Morgan; Eric A Hoffman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  A nasal cannula can be used to treat obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Brian M McGinley; Susheel P Patil; Jason P Kirkness; Philip L Smith; Alan R Schwartz; Hartmut Schneider
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Extrapolation of Calibration Curve of Hot-wire Spirometer Using a Novel Neural Network Based Approach.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Ardekani; Vahid Reza Nafisi; Foad Farhani
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2012-10

5.  Effect of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on esophageal and transpulmonary pressures in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Christophe Guervilly; Jean-Marie Forel; Sami Hraiech; Antoine Roch; Daniel Talmor; Laurent Papazian
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 6.925

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.