Literature DB >> 16502953

Cost utility analysis of physical activity counselling in general practice.

Kim Dalziel1, Leonie Segal, C Raina Elley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic performance of the 'Green Prescription' physical activity counselling program in general practice.
METHODS: Cost utility analysis using a Markov model was used to estimate the cost utility of the Green Prescription program over full life expectancy. Program effectiveness was based on published trial data (878 inactive patients presenting to NZ general practice). Costs were based on detailed costing information and were discounted at 5% per anum. The main outcome measure is cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Extensive one-way sensitivity analyses were performed along with probabilistic (stochastic) analysis.
RESULTS: Incremental, modelled cost utility of the Green Prescription program compared with 'usual care' was dollar NZ2,053 per QALY gained over full life expectancy (range dollar NZ827 to dollar NZ37,516 per QALY). Based on the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, 90% of ICERs fell below dollar NZ7,500 per QALY.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on a plausible and conservative set of assumptions, if decision makers are willing to pay at least dollar NZ2,000 per QALY gained the Green Prescription program is likely to represent better value for money than 'usual care'. IMPLICATIONS: The Green Prescription program performs well, representing a good buy relative to other published cost effectiveness estimates. Policy makers should consider encouraging general practitioners to prescribe physical activity advice in the primary care setting, in association with support from exercise specialists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16502953     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2006.tb00087.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  21 in total

1.  The Cost of Increasing Physical Activity and Maintaining Weight for Midlife Sedentary African American Women.

Authors:  Tricia J Johnson; Michael E Schoeny; Louis Fogg; JoEllen Wilbur
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 2.  Are physical activity interventions in primary care and the community cost-effective? A systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Sue Garrett; C Raina Elley; Sally B Rose; Des O'Dea; Beverley A Lawton; Anthony C Dowell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Cost-effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity: a modelling study.

Authors:  Linda J Cobiac; Theo Vos; Jan J Barendregt
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Cost-effectiveness implications of GP intervention to promote physical activity: evidence from Perth, Australia.

Authors:  Anura K Amarasinghe
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2010-05-13

Review 5.  Economic evaluation and transferability of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a systematic review.

Authors:  Silke B Wolfenstetter; Christina M Wenig
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Economic evaluation of lifestyle interventions for preventing diabetes and cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Sanjib Saha; Ulf-G Gerdtham; Pia Johansson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Healthy Steps trial: pedometer-based advice and physical activity for low-active older adults.

Authors:  Gregory S Kolt; Grant M Schofield; Ngaire Kerse; Nicholas Garrett; Toni Ashton; Asmita Patel
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Relationship of meeting physical activity guidelines with quality-adjusted life-years.

Authors:  Kai Sun; Jing Song; Larry M Manheim; Rowland W Chang; Kent C Kwoh; Pamela A Semanik; Charles B Eaton; Dorothy D Dunlop
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  The healthy steps study: a randomized controlled trial of a pedometer-based green prescription for older adults. Trial protocol.

Authors:  Gregory S Kolt; Grant M Schofield; Ngaire Kerse; Nicholas Garrett; Philip J Schluter; Toni Ashton; Asmita Patel
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Cost-effectiveness of a telephone-delivered intervention for physical activity and diet.

Authors:  Nicholas Graves; Adrian G Barnett; Kate A Halton; Jacob L Veerman; Elisabeth Winkler; Neville Owen; Marina M Reeves; Alison Marshall; Elizabeth Eakin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.