Literature DB >> 16502849

Comparing and unifying slope estimates across psychometric function models.

James M Gilchrist1, David Jerwood, H Sam Ismaiel.   

Abstract

The psychometric function relating stimulus intensity to response probability generally presents itself as a monotonically increasing sigmoid profile. Two summary parameters of the function are particularly important as measures of perceptual performance: the threshold parameter, which defines the location of the function over the stimulus axis (abscissa), and the slope parameter, which defines the (local) rate at which response probability increases with increasing stimulus intensity. In practice, the psychometric function may be modeled by a variety of mathematical structures, and the resulting algebraic expression describing the slope parameter may vary considerably between different functions fitted to the same experimental data. This variation often restricts comparisons between studies that select different functions and compromises the general interpretation of slope values. This article reviews the general characteristics of psychometric function models, discusses three strategies for resolving the issue of slope value differences, and presents mathematical expressions for implementing each strategy.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16502849     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  8 in total

1.  Relationships between the threshold and slope of psychometric and neurometric functions during perceptual learning: implications for neuronal pooling.

Authors:  Joshua I Gold; Chi-Tat Law; Patrick Connolly; Sharath Bennur
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  On the discrepant results in synchrony judgment and temporal-order judgment tasks: a quantitative model.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

3.  Psychometric functions for detection and discrimination with and without flankers.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Psychometric functions for pure tone intensity discrimination: slope differences in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Psychophysical measures of sensitivity to facial expression of emotion.

Authors:  Michelle Marneweck; Andrea Loftus; Geoff Hammond
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-20

6.  ErbB4 regulation of a thalamic reticular nucleus circuit for sensory selection.

Authors:  Sandra Ahrens; Santiago Jaramillo; Kai Yu; Sanchari Ghosh; Ga-Ram Hwang; Raehum Paik; Cary Lai; Miao He; Z Josh Huang; Bo Li
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Dynamic in-flight shifts of working memory resources across saccades.

Authors:  Rob Udale; Moc Tram Tran; Sanjay Manohar; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.077

8.  The role of melanopsin photoreception on visual attention linked pupil responses.

Authors:  Subodh Gnyawali; Beatrix Feigl; Prakash Adhikari; Andrew J Zele
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.698

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.