Literature DB >> 16502351

Phase II, parallel-design study of preoperative combined modality therapy and the matrix metalloprotease (mmp) inhibitor prinomastat in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Elisabeth I Heath1, Barbara A Burtness, Lawrence Kleinberg, Ronald R Salem, Stephen C Yang, Richard F Heitmiller, Marcia I Canto, Jonathan P S Knisely, Mark Topazian, Elizabeth Montgomery, Nancy Tsottles, Yazdi Pithavala, Bridget Rohmiller, Mary Collier, Arlene A Forastiere.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II, parallel-design study evaluated preoperative combined modality therapy and the matrix metalloprotease (MMP) inhibitor prinomastat in patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus that were stage II or greater. The objectives of the trial were to determine pathologic complete response rate (pCR), overall response rate, progression-free survival, pattern of disease relapse, and two-year and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative staging included computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound, and, when feasible, laparoscopy. Eligible patients were randomized to preoperative prinomastat or placebo, plus continuous infusion 5-FU, cisplatin, paclitaxel, and concurrent radiotherapy. Esophagectomy was performed on day 71. Adjuvant paclitaxel and prinomastat were available to all study patients.
RESULTS: Between August 2000 and June 2001, 15 of a planned 78 patients were randomized into the trial. One patient after randomization withdrew consent. Fourteen patients, 7 in each arm, completed preoperative treatment and surgery. pCR was achieved in 5 patients; 1/ 7 prinomastat and 4/ 7 placebo. Disease improvement was achieved in 7 patients; 5 /7 prinomastat and 2 /7 placebo. At a median follow-up of 28 months, 7 patients (2 prinomastat, 5 placebo) are alive with no evidence of disease. The primary prinomastat related toxicity was moderate to severe musculoskeletal toxicity interfering with daily function. This toxicity was managed with treatment rest, dose reduction, or discontinuation. Five patients (3 prinomastat and 2 placebo) had life-threatening thrombo-embolic events, which led to early evaluation of safety and efficacy, and subsequent termination of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: All patients, regardless of treatment arm, were able to successfully undergo neoadjuvant combined modality therapy and esophagectomy. However, early closure of the study due to unexpected thrombo-embolic events precluded any conclusions regarding clinical activity of prinomastat in locally advanced esophageal cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16502351     DOI: 10.1007/s10637-006-5934-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  19 in total

1.  Regulation of matrix metalloproteinases - their role in tumor invasion and metastasis.

Authors:  D Cottam; R Rees
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 2.  Clinical potential of matrix metalloprotease inhibitors in cancer therapy.

Authors:  E I Heath; L B Grochow
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

Review 4.  Surgery and current management for cancer of the esophagus and cardia.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; A P Barlow
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 5.  Matrix metalloproteinases: a review.

Authors:  H Birkedal-Hansen; W G Moore; M K Bodden; L J Windsor; B Birkedal-Hansen; A DeCarlo; J A Engler
Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med       Date:  1993

6.  Intensive chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  A A Forastiere; R F Heitmiller; D J Lee; M Zahurak; R Abrams; L Kleinberg; S Watkins; C J Yeo; K D Lillemoe; J V Sitzmann; W Sharfman
Journal:  Cancer J Sci Am       Date:  1997 May-Jun

7.  Mature survival results with preoperative cisplatin, protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil, and 44-Gy radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Lawrence Kleinberg; Jonathan P S Knisely; Richard Heitmiller; Marriana Zahurak; Ronald Salem; Barbara Burtness; Elizabeth I Heath; Arlene A Forastiere
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  R A Cukingnan; J S Carey
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Matrix metalloproteinase-1 is associated with poor prognosis in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  G I Murray; M E Duncan; P O'Neil; J A McKay; W T Melvin; J E Fothergill
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 10.  Thromboembolic complications of cancer: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Douglas E Sutherland; Ilene C Weitz; Howard A Liebman
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.047

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy: Turning Past Failures Into Future Successes.

Authors:  Arthur Winer; Sylvia Adams; Paolo Mignatti
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 2.  Liver regeneration and tumor stimulation--a review of cytokine and angiogenic factors.

Authors:  Christopher Christophi; Nadia Harun; Theodora Fifis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Alterations of glutathione S-transferase and matrix metalloproteinase-9 expressions are early events in esophageal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Laszlo Herszenyi; Istvan Hritz; Istvan Pregun; Ferenc Sipos; Mark Juhasz; Bela Molnar; Zsolt Tulassay
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Integration of targeted agents in the neo-adjuvant treatment of gastro-esophageal cancers.

Authors:  D G Power; D H Ilson
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 8.168

5.  In vivo efficacy of marimastat and chemoradiation in head and neck cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Joni B Skipper; Lacey R McNally; Eben L Rosenthal; Wenquan Wang; Donald J Buchsbaum
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 1.538

6.  Proteomic Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tissues With Encapsulation Shows Up-regulation of Leucine Aminopeptidase 3 and Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase 2.

Authors:  Keisuke Kuhara; Takao Kitagawa; Byron Baron; Kazuhiro Tokuda; Kazuhiko Sakamoto; Hiroaki Nagano; Kazuyuki Nakamura; Masanobu Kobayashi; Hiroki Nagayasu; Yasuhiro Kuramitsu
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.069

Review 7.  The Pharmacological TAILS of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Inhibitors.

Authors:  Nabangshu Das; Colette Benko; Sean E Gill; Antoine Dufour
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-31

Review 8.  Proteinases in the joint: clinical relevance of proteinases in joint destruction.

Authors:  Yvonne Rengel; Caroline Ospelt; Steffen Gay
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.156

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.