Literature DB >> 16502055

Simple radiological indicators for staghorn calculi response to ESWL.

M S Murshidi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate staghorn calculi response to ESWL using simple radiological indicators which are stone size, stone homogeneity, and stone density. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study of 60 patients with staghorn calculi where the majority had ESWL. The relationship between response and size, homogeneity and density is studied.
RESULTS: Single staghorn calculus less than 4 cm, heterogeneous with stone density similar to bone or a little denser than bone has best response to ESWL.
CONCLUSION: ESWL is useful as first line therapy for staghorn calculi less than 4 cm, heterogeneous with similar density to bone or a little denser than bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16502055     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-005-3156-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  8 in total

1.  Urolithiasis through the ages.

Authors:  Jyoti Shah; H N Whitfield
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  The management of stone disease.

Authors:  S A H Rizvi; S A A Naqvi; Z Hussain; A Hashmi; M Hussain; M N Zafar; H Mehdi; R Khalid
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. What is its role in 1997?

Authors:  J S Wolf; R V Clayman
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Hospital of Indiana experience.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; D Newman; J H Mertz; P G Mosbaugh; R E Steele; R J Kahnoski; T A Coury; J R Woods
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Lithotripsy.

Authors:  H N Whitfield
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1988-05

6.  In situ extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of distal ureteral stones: parameters for therapeutic success.

Authors:  P Mattelaer; T Schröder; N Fischer; G Jakse
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: multicenter study of kidney and upper ureter versus middle and lower ureter treatments.

Authors:  J T Ehreth; G W Drach; M L Arnett; R B Barnett; D Govan; J Lingeman; S A Loening; D M Newman; J M Tudor; S Saada
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Comparison of first generation (Dornier HM3) and second generation (Medstone STS) lithotriptors: treatment results with 13,864 renal and ureteral calculi.

Authors:  A S Cass
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.450

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  The effect of stone and patient characteristics in predicting extra-corporal shock wave lithotripsy success rate: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Mohammad Al-Zubi; Ammar Al Sleibi; Basel Mazen Elayan; Subhi Zahi Al-Issawi; Morad Bani-Hani; Adel Alsharei; Jad AlSmadi; Saleh Abualhaj; Ala' Y Ibrahim
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-09-10

2.  Modern management of stone disease in patients with a solitary kidney.

Authors:  Maciej Kupajski; Michał Tkocz; Damian Ziaja
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.195

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.