Literature DB >> 3520015

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Hospital of Indiana experience.

J E Lingeman, D Newman, J H Mertz, P G Mosbaugh, R E Steele, R J Kahnoski, T A Coury, J R Woods.   

Abstract

A total of 982 patients underwent 1,416 treatments with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi between February 23 and December 17, 1984. A single treatment was performed in 90 per cent of the patients. Morbidity was extremely low and hospital stay was short (3.0 days). Adjunctive procedures were required in 13 per cent of the patients. Of the kidneys 72 per cent were free of stones at the 3-month followup, while 23 per cent contained small (less than 5 mm.), asymptomatic fragments believed to be passable spontaneously. Only 1 per cent of the patients required surgical removal of the calculi. Morbidity was related directly to stone burden, while results were inversely related to stone burden. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is the preferred form of management for symptomatic upper ureteral and renal calculi less than 2 cm. in diameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3520015     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)46016-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  43 in total

1.  Treatment of radiolucent renal calculi using ESWL combined with urine alkalinization.

Authors:  M I Ezzat
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of urinary calculi. Theory, efficacy, and adverse effects.

Authors:  J M Kelley
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-07

Review 3.  Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai; J J M de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  High-frequency jet ventilation is beneficial during shock wave lithotripsy utilizing a newer unit with a narrower focal zone.

Authors:  Phillip Mucksavage; Wesley A Mayer; Jeff E Mandel; Keith N Van Arsdalen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Shock wave lithotripsy is not predictive of hypertension among community stone formers at long-term followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Andrew D Rule; Xujian Li; Eric J Bergstralh; Matthew T Gettman; John C Lieske
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on renal tissue. A review.

Authors:  K S Ackaert; F H Schröder
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1989

7.  Evaluation of possible predictive variables for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.

Authors:  Yong Il Park; Ji Hyeong Yu; Luck Hee Sung; Chung Hee Noh; Jae Yong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

8.  Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Joshua S Neucks; R Jason VonDerHaar; Irina V Pishchalnikova; James C Williams; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Interventional procedures in the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  M P Banner; P Ramchandani; H M Pollack
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Calyceal stones: fate of shock wave therapy with respect to stone localization.

Authors:  A Koşar; K Türkölmez; K Sarica; Y Z Müftüoğlu; O Gögüş; K Aydos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.