Literature DB >> 25392739

Subcutaneous administration of D-luciferin is an effective alternative to intraperitoneal injection in bioluminescence imaging of xenograft tumors in nude mice.

Ashraf A Khalil1, Mark J Jameson2, William C Broaddus3, Theodore D Chung4, Sarah E Golding5, Seth M Dever5, Elisabeth Rosenberg5, Kristoffer Valerie5.   

Abstract

Currently, intraperitoneal (IP) injection of D-luciferin is the preferred method of providing substrate for bioluminescent imaging (BLI); however it has a failure rate of 3-10% due to accidental intestinal injection. The present study evaluates the quality of BLI after subcutaneous (SC) injection of D-luciferin and demonstrates the effectiveness of SC injection in anatomically disparate tumor models. Mice bearing luciferase-expressing tumors underwent BLI after SC or IP injection of D-luciferin. The average time to maximal luminescence was 6 min (range 5-9 min) after SC injection and 8 min (range 5-8 min) after IP injection. Within 7 minutes of injection, SC and IP routes yielded similar luminescence in subcutaneous, intracranial, tongue, and lung xenograft tumor models. In a model of combined subcutaneous and intracranial xenografts, SC injection resulted in proportional luminescence at all sites, confirming that preferential delivery of substrate does not occur. While tumors were occasionally not visualized with IP injection, all tumors were visualized reliably with SC injection. Thus, SC injection of D-luciferin is a convenient and effective alternative to IP injection for BLI in nude mice. It may be a preferable approach, particularly for tumors with weaker signals and/or when greater precision is required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D-luciferin; bioluminescence

Year:  2013        PMID: 25392739      PMCID: PMC4226276          DOI: 10.1155/2013/689279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISRN Mol Imaging        ISSN: 2090-8962


  27 in total

1.  Patient tumor EGFR and PDGFRA gene amplifications retained in an invasive intracranial xenograft model of glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Caterina Giannini; Jann N Sarkaria; Atsushi Saito; Joon H Uhm; Evanthia Galanis; Brett L Carlson; Mark A Schroeder; C David James
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Bioluminescence imaging: progress and applications.

Authors:  Christian E Badr; Bakhos A Tannous
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 19.536

3.  Non-invasive detection of a small number of bioluminescent cancer cells in vivo.

Authors:  Jae-Beom Kim; Konnie Urban; Edward Cochran; Steve Lee; Angel Ang; Bradley Rice; Adam Bata; Kenneth Campbell; Richard Coffee; Alex Gorodinsky; Zhan Lu; He Zhou; Takashi Kei Kishimoto; Peter Lassota
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal injection of D-luciferin for in vivo bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  Yusuke Inoue; Shigeru Kiryu; Kiyoko Izawa; Makoto Watanabe; Arinobu Tojo; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Cell uptake and tissue distribution of radioiodine labelled D-luciferin: implications for luciferase based gene imaging.

Authors:  K-H Lee; S S Byun; J-Y Paik; S Y Lee; S H Song; Y S Choe; B-T Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.690

6.  Bioluminescent molecular imaging of endogenous and exogenous p53-mediated transcription in vitro and in vivo using an HCT116 human colon carcinoma xenograft model.

Authors:  Wenge Wang; Wafik S El-Deiry
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.742

7.  ABCG2/BCRP expression modulates D-Luciferin based bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  Yimao Zhang; Joseph P Bressler; Jeff Neal; Bachchu Lal; Hyo-Eun C Bhang; John Laterra; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Imaging the immune response to monitor tumor immunotherapy.

Authors:  Qin Wang; Moshe Ornstein; Howard L Kaufman
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.217

9.  Validating bioluminescence imaging as a high-throughput, quantitative modality for assessing tumor burden.

Authors:  Zain Paroo; Robert A Bollinger; Dwaine A Braasch; Edmond Richer; David R Corey; Peter P Antich; Ralph P Mason
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.488

10.  Timing of imaging after d-luciferin injection affects the longitudinal assessment of tumor growth using in vivo bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  Yusuke Inoue; Shigeru Kiryu; Makoto Watanabe; Arinobu Tojo; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2010-07-05
View more
  5 in total

1.  Replication Study: Biomechanical remodeling of the microenvironment by stromal caveolin-1 favors tumor invasion and metastasis.

Authors:  Mee Rie Sheen; Jennifer L Fields; Brian Northan; Judith Lacoste; Lay-Hong Ang; Steven Fiering
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Optimizing live-animal bioluminescence imaging prediction of tumor burden in human prostate cancer xenograft models in SCID-NSG mice.

Authors:  Sangyub Kim; Yong Zhang; Suni Tang; Chongtao Qin; Deepkamal Karelia; Arati Sharma; Cheng Jiang; Junxuan Lu
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  Replication Study: BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc.

Authors:  Fraser Aird; Irawati Kandela; Christine Mantis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Flavopiridol (Alvocidib), a Cyclin-dependent Kinases (CDKs) Inhibitor, Found Synergy Effects with Niclosamide in Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Xu Hannah Zhang; Jack Hsiang; Steven T Rosen
Journal:  J Clin Haematol       Date:  2021-05-04

5.  Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  J Stollfuss; N Landvogt; M Abenstein; S Ziegler; M Schwaiger; R Senekowitsch-Schmidtke; H Wieder
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.138

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.