Literature DB >> 16499466

Measuring end-of-life care outcomes prospectively.

Karen E Steinhauser1.   

Abstract

This paper discusses the state of the science in prospective measurement in end-of-life research and identifies particular areas for focused attention. Topics include defining the scope of inquiry, evaluating experiences of patients too ill to communicate, the role of proxy and family response, measurement sensitivity to change, the role of theory in guiding measurement efforts, evaluating relationships between domains of end-of-life experience, and measurement of cultural comprehensiveness. The state of the sciences calls for future research to (1) conduct longitudinal studies to capture transitions in end-of-life trajectories; (2) evaluate the quality of proxy reporting as it varies by rater relationship, domain, and over time; (3) use state-of-the art psychometric and longitudinal techniques to validate measures and to assess sensitivity to change; (4) develop further and test conceptual models of the experience of dying; (5) study the inter-relatedness of multiple dimensions of end-of-life trajectories; (6) compile updated information evaluating available measurement tools; and (7) conduct population- based research with attention to ethnic and age diversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16499466     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.s-30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  12 in total

1.  The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): empirical domains and theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Lois Downey; J Randall Curtis; William E Lafferty; Jerald R Herting; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Measuring caregiver outcomes in palliative care: a construct validation study of two instruments for use in economic evaluations.

Authors:  Renske Hoefman; Hareth Al-Janabi; Nikki McCaffrey; David Currow; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Conducting research with end-of-life populations: overcoming recruitment challenges when working with clinical agencies.

Authors:  Dena J Fischer; Sandy C Burgener; Karen Kavanaugh; Catherine Ryan; Gail Keenan
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.257

4.  Cognitive interviewing of bereaved relatives to improve the measurement of health outcomes and care utilisation at the end of life in a mortality followback survey.

Authors:  Barbara Gomes; Paul McCrone; Sue Hall; Julia Riley; Jonathan Koffman; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Beyond palliative radiotherapy: a pilot multidisciplinary brain metastases clinic.

Authors:  Brita Danielson; Alysa Fairchild
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Late-stage HIV/AIDS patients' and their familial caregivers' agreement on the palliative care outcome scale.

Authors:  Rachel Krug; Daniel Karus; Peter A Selwyn; Victoria H Raveis
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  End-of-life experiences of nurses and physicians in the newborn intensive care unit.

Authors:  E G Epstein
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Measuring the quality of dying and death in the pediatric intensive care setting: the clinician PICU-QODD.

Authors:  Deborah E Sellers; Ree Dawson; Adena Cohen-Bearak; Mildred Z Solomond; Robert D Truog
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Communication, decision making, and cancer: what African Americans want physicians to know.

Authors:  Sharon W Williams; Laura C Hanson; Carlton Boyd; Melissa Green; Moses Goldmon; Gratia Wright; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 10.  Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.