Literature DB >> 16494685

The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing.

R Weidner1, N J Shah, G R Fink.   

Abstract

Four-dot masking is a new form of visual masking that does not involve local contour interactions or spatial superimposition of the target stimulus and the mask (as, e.g., in pattern or metacontrast masking). Rather, the effective masking mechanism is based on object substitution. Object substitution masking occurs when low-level visual information representations are altered before target identification through iterative interaction with high-level visual processing stages has been completed. Interestingly, object substitution interacts with attention processes: Strong masking effects are observed when attentional orientation toward the target location is delayed. In contrast, no masking occurs when attention can be rapidly shifted to and engaged onto the target location. We investigated the neural basis of object substitution masking by studying the interaction of spatial attention and masking processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Behavioral data indicated a two-way interaction between the factors Spatial Attention (valid vs. invalid cueing) and Masking (four-dot vs. pattern masking). As expected, spatial attention improved performance more strongly during object substitution masking. Functional correlates of this interaction were found in the primary visual cortex, higher visual areas, and left intraparietal sulcus. A region-of-interest analysis in these areas revealed that the largest blood oxygenation level-dependent signal changes occurred during effective four-dot masking. In contrast, the weakest signal changes in these areas were observed when target visibility was highest. The data suggest that these areas represent an object substitution network dedicated to the generation and testing of a perceptual hypotheses as described by the object substitution theory of masking of Di-Lollo et al. [Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507, 2000].

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16494685     DOI: 10.1162/089892906775783651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Visuomotor memory is independent of conscious awareness of target features.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Kristina A Neely; Jason Yakimishyn; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Substituting objects from consciousness: a review of object substitution masking.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Jay Pratt; Paul E Dux; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

3.  Neural substrates of visual masking by object substitution in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Junghee Lee; Mark S Cohen; Stephen A Engel; David Glahn; Keith H Nuechterlein; Jonathan K Wynn; Michael F Green
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural processing stages during object-substitution masking and their relationship to perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Joseph A Harris; Solange Ku; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Reentrant processing mediates object substitution masking: comment on Põder (2013).

Authors:  Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-04

6.  The central-peripheral dichotomy and metacontrast masking.

Authors:  Li Zhaoping; Yushi Liu
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 1.695

7.  Brain dynamics underlying the nonlinear threshold for access to consciousness.

Authors:  Antoine Del Cul; Sylvain Baillet; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.029

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.