Literature DB >> 16493258

Cervical cancer screening: state of the art.

Victor M Valdespino1, Victor E Valdespino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The objective of cervical cancer screening is to prevent the occurrence of and death from cervical cancer by detecting and treating high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. A significant decline in occurrence and mortality from cervical cancer in developed countries has been associated with the application of organized cervical screening programs. The use of the available local health methods in cervical cancer screening can be adjusted in different countries. This review discusses the recent results in traditional and alternative cervical cancer screening. RECENT
FINDINGS: The current recommendations of both the American Cancer Society and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists concerning clinical practice guidelines for cervical cancer screening are commented upon. New methods and new technology for cervical cancer screening are described. Attributable failure factors in the screening process, particularly in the coverage, are analyzed. A critical assessment of the suitability of local cervical cancer screening resources is discussed.
SUMMARY: Screening is clearly a complex multifactorial process, not a test. Nowadays, with the human papillomavirus vaccine on the horizon, screening is the best strategy for cervical cancer control. Good screening programs, with high coverage, quality control and follow-up included, are the basis of obtaining better results. The Papanicolaou test and its variants are the best methods of cervical cancer screening in high-resource settings. Alternative visual inspection using cervical dyes could be the most useful method in low-resource settings. The challenge for the future may be less of a technical nature and more dependent on local finances and screening policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16493258     DOI: 10.1097/01.gco.0000192971.59943.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of lung MDCT nodule annotation across radiologists and methods.

Authors:  Charles R Meyer; Timothy D Johnson; Geoffrey McLennan; Denise R Aberle; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber Macmahon; Brian F Mullan; David F Yankelevitz; Edwin J R van Beek; Samuel G Armato; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Anthony P Reeves; David Gur; Claudia I Henschke; Eric A Hoffman; Peyton H Bland; Gary Laderach; Richie Pais; David Qing; Chris Piker; Junfeng Guo; Adam Starkey; Daniel Max; Barbara Y Croft; Laurence P Clarke
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Association of interleukin-12 gene polymorphisms with cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Su-Wen Chang; Gui-Qin Xu; Yong-Ling Fan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

3.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and risk of cervical cancer: A case-control study.

Authors:  Lihua Zhang; Zhenchao Ruan; Qingya Hong; Xiangzhen Gong; Zhengguang Hu; Yan Huang; Aidi Xu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  The Relationship between Healthcare Providers and Preventive Practices: Narratives on Access to Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Daniela Lemmo; Maria Luisa Martino; Anna Rosa Donizzetti; Maria Francesca Freda; Daniela Caso
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Age and Pattern of Pap Smear Abnormalities: Implications for Cervical Cancer Control in a Developing Country.

Authors:  Adepiti Clement Akinfolarin; Ajenifuja Kayode Olusegun; Okunola Omoladun; G O Omoniyi-Esan; Uche Onwundiegu
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.