Literature DB >> 16492914

Toxicokinetics of acrylamide in humans after ingestion of a defined dose in a test meal to improve risk assessment for acrylamide carcinogenicity.

Uwe Fuhr1, Melanie I Boettcher, Martina Kinzig-Schippers, Alexandra Weyer, Alexander Jetter, Andreas Lazar, Dirk Taubert, Dorota Tomalik-Scharte, Panagiota Pournara, Verena Jakob, Stefanie Harlfinger, Tobias Klaassen, Albrecht Berkessel, Jürgen Angerer, Fritz Sörgel, Edgar Schömig.   

Abstract

High amounts of acrylamide in some foods result in an estimated daily mean intake of 50 microg for a western style diet. Animal studies have shown the carcinogenicity of acrylamide upon oral exposure. However, only sparse human toxicokinetic data is available for acrylamide, which is needed for the extrapolation of human cancer risk from animal data. We evaluated the toxicokinetics of acrylamide in six young healthy volunteers after the consumption of a meal containing 0.94 mg of acrylamide. Urine was collected up to 72 hours thereafter. Unchanged acrylamide, its mercapturic acid metabolite N-acetyl-S-(2-carbamoylethyl)cysteine (AAMA), its epoxy derivative glycidamide, and the respective metabolite of glycidamide, N-acetyl-S-(2-hydroxy-2-carbamoylethyl)cysteine (GAMA), were quantified in the urine by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Toxicokinetic variables were obtained by noncompartmental methods. Overall, 60.3 +/- 11.2% of the dose was recovered in the urine. Although no glycidamide was found, unchanged acrylamide, AAMA, and GAMA accounted for urinary excretion of (mean +/- SD) 4.4 +/- 1.5%, 50.0 +/- 9.4%, and 5.9 +/- 1.2% of the dose, respectively. Apparent terminal elimination half-lives for the substances were 2.4 +/- 0.4, 17.4 +/- 3.9, and 25.1 +/- 6.4 hours. The ratio of GAMA/AAMA amounts excreted was 0.12 +/- 0.02. In conclusion, most of the acrylamide ingested with food is absorbed in humans. Conjugation with glutathione exceeds the formation of the reactive metabolite glycidamide. The data suggests an at least 2-fold and 4-fold lower relative internal exposure for glycidamide from dietary acrylamide in humans compared with rats or mice, respectively. This should be considered for quantitative cancer risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16492914     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  16 in total

1.  Biological monitoring for occupational acrylamide exposure from acrylamide production workers.

Authors:  Yu-Fang Huang; Kuen-Yuh Wu; Saou-Hsing Liou; Shi-Nian Uang; Chu-Chih Chen; Wei-Chung Shih; Shih-Chuan Lee; Chih-Chun Jean Huang; Mei-Lien Chen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Comparison of Biomarkers of Tobacco Exposure between Premium and Discount Brand Cigarette Smokers in the NHANES 2011-2012 Special Sample.

Authors:  Emily J Wasserman; Samantha M Reilly; Reema Goel; Jonathan Foulds; John P Richie; Joshua E Muscat
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 4.  The role of endogenous versus exogenous sources in the exposome of putative genotoxins and consequences for risk assessment.

Authors:  Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Arand Michael; Hermann M Bolt; Bourdoux Siméon; Hartwig Andrea; Hinrichsen Nils; Kalisch Christine; Mally Angela; Pellegrino Gloria; Ribera Daniel; Thatcher Natalie; Eisenbrand Gerhard
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 6.168

Review 5.  Dietary acrylamide and human cancer: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Mandeep K Virk-Baker; Tim R Nagy; Stephen Barnes; John Groopman
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.900

6.  Urinary biomarkers of smokers' exposure to tobacco smoke constituents in tobacco products assessment: a fit for purpose approach.

Authors:  Evan O Gregg; Emmanuel Minet; Michael McEwan
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Protective effect of rosemary on acrylamide motor neurotoxicity in spinal cord of rat offspring: postnatal follow-up study.

Authors:  Marwa A Al-Gholam; Hanaa Zakaria Nooh; Abeer E El-Mehi; Abd El-Moneum El-Barbary; Ahmed Zo El Fokar
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-03-28

Review 8.  Exposure assessment of process-related contaminants in food by biomarker monitoring.

Authors:  Ivonne M C M Rietjens; P Dussort; Helmut Günther; Paul Hanlon; Hiroshi Honda; Angela Mally; Sue O'Hagan; Gabriele Scholz; Albrecht Seidel; James Swenberg; Justin Teeguarden; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Biomarker monitoring of controlled dietary acrylamide exposure indicates consistent human endogenous background.

Authors:  Katharina Goempel; Laura Tedsen; Meike Ruenz; Tamara Bakuradze; Dorothea Schipp; Jens Galan; Gerhard Eisenbrand; Elke Richling
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Protocol to assess the impact of tobacco-induced volatile organic compounds on cardiovascular risk in a cross- sectional cohort: Cardiovascular Injury due to Tobacco Use study.

Authors:  Rachel J Keith; Jessica L Fetterman; Daniel W Riggs; Timothy O'Toole; Jessica L Nystoriak; Monika Holbrook; Pawel Lorkiewicz; Aruni Bhatnagar; Andrew P DeFilippis; Naomi M Hamburg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.