OBJECTIVE: To review and critique evidence for the use of the bispectral index (BIS) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. DATA SOURCES: A computer search of English-language articles in MEDLINE (1966-July 2005), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1971-July 2005), and Scientific Citation Index Expanded (1980-July 2005) was conducted. A manual search of abstracts was also performed using the key search terms BIS, sedation, and critical care. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Case series, letters, editorials, and clinical studies that evaluated BIS in ICU patients were considered for inclusion. DATA SYNTHESIS: Nineteen studies comparing the BIS with sedation scales were evaluated, revealing that the BIS trends lower with increasing sedation. The BIS appeared to correlate better when sedation scores were grouped rather than individual values. However, correlations between BIS and subjective scales were low in most studies (r(2) 0.21-0.93). Additionally, there was poor correlation between drug dosage and the BIS. Randomized, controlled trials demonstrating improved outcomes with BIS monitoring have not been reported. CONCLUSIONS: Interpreting literature on the usefulness of the BIS in the ICU is difficult for reasons that include heterogeneous populations, different methods of collecting BIS data, and use of different versions of BIS software and hardware. Outcomes data are lacking. The 2002 Society of Critical Care Medicine Sedation Guidelines recommendation that more data are needed before the BIS should be used routinely in the ICU remains unchanged. We recommend that further studies be conducted to determine the optimal method of obtaining BIS data and evaluate the impact of the BIS on relevant patient outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To review and critique evidence for the use of the bispectral index (BIS) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. DATA SOURCES: A computer search of English-language articles in MEDLINE (1966-July 2005), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1971-July 2005), and Scientific Citation Index Expanded (1980-July 2005) was conducted. A manual search of abstracts was also performed using the key search terms BIS, sedation, and critical care. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Case series, letters, editorials, and clinical studies that evaluated BIS in ICU patients were considered for inclusion. DATA SYNTHESIS: Nineteen studies comparing the BIS with sedation scales were evaluated, revealing that the BIS trends lower with increasing sedation. The BIS appeared to correlate better when sedation scores were grouped rather than individual values. However, correlations between BIS and subjective scales were low in most studies (r(2) 0.21-0.93). Additionally, there was poor correlation between drug dosage and the BIS. Randomized, controlled trials demonstrating improved outcomes with BIS monitoring have not been reported. CONCLUSIONS: Interpreting literature on the usefulness of the BIS in the ICU is difficult for reasons that include heterogeneous populations, different methods of collecting BIS data, and use of different versions of BIS software and hardware. Outcomes data are lacking. The 2002 Society of Critical Care Medicine Sedation Guidelines recommendation that more data are needed before the BIS should be used routinely in the ICU remains unchanged. We recommend that further studies be conducted to determine the optimal method of obtaining BIS data and evaluate the impact of the BIS on relevant patient outcomes.
Authors: Jörg Martin; Anja Heymann; Katrin Bäsell; Ralf Baron; Rolf Biniek; Hartmut Bürkle; Peter Dall; Christine Dictus; Verena Eggers; Ingolf Eichler; Lothar Engelmann; Lars Garten; Wolfgang Hartl; Ulrike Haase; Ralf Huth; Paul Kessler; Stefan Kleinschmidt; Wolfgang Koppert; Franz-Josef Kretz; Heinz Laubenthal; Guenter Marggraf; Andreas Meiser; Edmund Neugebauer; Ulrike Neuhaus; Christian Putensen; Michael Quintel; Alexander Reske; Bernard Roth; Jens Scholz; Stefan Schröder; Dierk Schreiter; Jürgen Schüttler; Gerhard Schwarzmann; Robert Stingele; Peter Tonner; Philip Tränkle; Rolf Detlef Treede; Tomislav Trupkovic; Michael Tryba; Frank Wappler; Christian Waydhas; Claudia Spies Journal: Ger Med Sci Date: 2010-02-02
Authors: Pierre Trouiller; Pascal Fangio; Catherine Paugam-Burtz; Corinne Appéré-de-Vecchi; Paul Merckx; Nicolas Louvet; Sebastian Pease; Hervé Outin; Jean Mantz; Bernard De Jonghe Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 17.440