Literature DB >> 1649265

Comparison of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine with an alternating regimen of methotrexate, etoposide, and cisplatin/cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine in the treatment of extensive-disease small-cell lung carcinoma: a Mid-Atlantic Oncology Program study.

G L Wampler1, W J Heim, N M Ellison, J D Ahlgren, J G Fryer.   

Abstract

An alternating regimen for the treatment of extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was compared with standard treatment with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) in 170 patients. Overall severity of toxicity was similar in both arms, with four toxic deaths in each arm (4.7%). Response results were also similar, with 54% complete and partial responses with the standard regimen and 53% complete and partial responses with the alternating regimen. Median survival time was 6.9 months with the standard regimen and 9.2 months with the alternating regimen (P = .078). The 2-year survival rate was 1.2% for the standard regimen and 4.7% for the alternating regimen. Survival benefit for treatment with the alternating regimen reached statistical significance only in those subsets of patients with poorer prognosis (male sex, performance status 3, liver metastases, bone marrow metastases, and oat cell histologic subtype).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1649265     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.8.1438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  7 in total

Review 1.  Strategies to avoid treatment-induced lineage crisis in advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guilhem Roubaud; Bobby C Liaw; William K Oh; David J Mulholland
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Calculation of received dose intensity for combinations of drugs using small-cell lung carcinoma treatment regimens as examples.

Authors:  G L Wampler; J G Fryer
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Isuru U Amarasena; Saion Chatterjee; Julia A E Walters; Richard Wood-Baker; Kwun M Fong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-02

4.  NMDA receptors are expressed by small-cell lung cancer and are potential targets for effective treatment.

Authors:  William G North; Guohong Gao; Amy Jensen; Vincent A Memoli; Jinlin Du
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-04-01

5.  Is there a case for cisplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis of randomized trials of a cisplatin-containing regimen versus a regimen without this alkylating agent.

Authors:  J L Pujol; L Carestia; J P Daurès
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Small-cell lung cancer growth inhibition: synergism between NMDA receptor blockade and chemotherapy.

Authors:  William G North; Fuli Liu; Konstantin H Dragnev; Eugene Demidenko
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-23

7.  Growth Impairment of Small-Cell Cancer by Targeting Pro-Vasopressin with MAG-1 Antibody.

Authors:  William G North; Bernard Cole; Bonnie Akerman; Roy H L Pang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.