Literature DB >> 16492053

Theoretical investigations on chalcogen-chalcogen interactions: what makes these nonbonded interactions bonding?

Christian Bleiholder1, Daniel B Werz, Horst Köppel, Rolf Gleiter.   

Abstract

To understand the intermolecular interactions between chalcogen centers (O, S, Se, Te), quantum chemical calculations on pairs of model systems were carried out. For the oxygen derivatives, one of the components of the supermolecules consists of dimethyl ether, while the second component is either dimethyl ether (1) or ethynyl methyl ether (2) or methyl cyanate (3). The model calculations were also extended to the sulfur (4-6), selenium (7-9), and tellurium congeners (10-12). The MP2/SDB-cc-pVTZ, 6-311G level of theory was used to derive the geometrical parameters and the global energies of the model systems. A detailed analysis based on symmetry adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) reveals that induction and dispersion forces contribute to the bonding in each case. For 1-3 the electrostatic energy also contributes to the intermolecular bonding, but not for 4-12. The NBO analysis reveals that the interaction in the dimers 1-3 is mainly due to weak hydrogen bonding between methyl groups and chalcogen centers. Similar hydrogen bonding is also found in the case of 4 and to a lesser extent in 5 and 7. For the aggregates with heavier centers the chalcogen-chalcogen interaction dominates, and hydrogen bonding only plays a minor role. Electron-withdrawing groups on the chalcogen centers increase the interaction energy and reduce the intermolecular distance dramatically. The one-electron picture of an interaction between the lone pair of the donor and the chalcogen carbon sigma orbital allows a qualitatively correct reproduction of the observed trend.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 16492053     DOI: 10.1021/ja056827g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  30 in total

1.  Tuning of chalcogen bonds by cation-π interactions: cooperative and diminutive effects.

Authors:  Mehdi D Esrafili; Nasibeh Saeidi; Mohammad Solimannejad
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Sigma-hole bonding: molecules containing group VI atoms.

Authors:  Jane S Murray; Pat Lane; Timothy Clark; Peter Politzer
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Sigma-hole bonding between like atoms; a fallacy of atomic charges.

Authors:  Peter Politzer; Jane S Murray; Monica C Concha
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Halogen bonds enhanced by σ-hole and π-hole interactions: a comparative study on cooperativity and competition effects between X∙∙∙N and S∙∙∙N interactions in H3N∙∙∙XCN∙∙∙SF2 and H 3N∙∙∙XCN∙∙∙SO2 complexes (X   = F, Cl, Br and I).

Authors:  Mehdi D Esrafili; Mahshad Vakili
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Chalcogen-bonded complexes. Selenium-bound adducts of NH3, H2O, PH3, and H2S with OCSe, SCSe, and CSe2.

Authors:  Ponnadurai Ramasami; Thomas A Ford
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Blue shifts vs red shifts in sigma-hole bonding.

Authors:  Jane S Murray; Monica C Concha; Pat Lane; Pavel Hobza; Peter Politzer
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  An ab initio study on tunability of σ-hole interactions in XHS:PH2Y and XH2P:SHY complexes (X = F, Cl, Br; Y = H, OH, OCH3, CH3, C2H5, and NH2).

Authors:  Mehdi D Esrafili; Nafiseh Mohammadirad
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  An ab initio study on the concerted interaction between chalcogen and pnicogen bonds.

Authors:  Bahman Mohammadian Asiabar; Mehdi D Esrafili; Fariba Mohammadian-Sabet; Hamid Reza Sobhi; Majid Javaheri
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 1.810

9.  Does single-electron chalcogen bond exist? Some theoretical insights.

Authors:  Mehdi D Esrafili; Fariba Mohammadian-Sabet
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Why are dimethyl sulfoxide and dimethyl sulfone such good solvents?

Authors:  Timothy Clark; Jane S Murray; Pat Lane; Peter Politzer
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 1.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.